On Wednesday 28 January 2009, "JK E-Lists" wrote:
> GoDaddy requires that (some? all?) name servers not only have resolvable
> names but *also* be on this "approved" list of name servers before it
> will allow them to be used.
Actually, it's Verisign that requires it for delegations for any domai
I appreciate all the responses. Here is what I did to fix the problem, and if I
may ask a follow-up question.
Ollie mentioned "you have to create a 'Host Handle' in the registry database at
first, normally your registrar".
1) With my ISP's help, I got into the their domain registration manage
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:07:53AM -0800, Augie Schwer wrote:
> We discussed this on #powerdns a bit as it came up on the
> dns-operations list; the conclusion was that dropping the request was
> worse because it opened up spoofing attacks. Thanks for the
> suggestion though. --Augie
>
Yes, tha
Godaddy should allow you to register name servers somewhere on that
site. You might need to call them.
--Curtis
JK E-Lists wrote:
First of all, many kudos for PDNS. A name server that doesn't require you to be an Einstein to run!
Second of all, I apologize because this is only remotely relat
We discussed this on #powerdns a bit as it came up on the
dns-operations list; the conclusion was that dropping the request was
worse because it opened up spoofing attacks. Thanks for the
suggestion though. --Augie
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Leen Besselink wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at
What does the zone look like? Do you have fancy-records turned on in
the pdns.conf ?
--Augie
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Christian Kuehn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with the new pdns-2.9.22.
>
> I one domain the pdns will not detect the wildcard-entry:
>
> Jan 28 10:29:04 Received a p
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 07:21:38PM +0100, Arjan Schrijver wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> After some complaints that our DNS server was not answering all
> questions correctly, we found out that our PowerDNS installation thinks
> it's authoritative for the root '.' domain. The domain has domain_id 1,
> s
Hi list,
After some complaints that our DNS server was not answering all
questions correctly, we found out that our PowerDNS installation thinks
it's authoritative for the root '.' domain. The domain has domain_id 1,
so my guess is that it has been added by the PowerDNS installation. The
prob
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 09:21:44AM -0700, JK E-Lists wrote:
...
>
> 7) It complains that my name servers are not "registered".
> See screen snapshot at http://www.ifm-services.com/tmp/godaddy-ns.jpg
For gTLDs (like .com is) you have to create a 'Host Handle' in the registry
database at first, no
First of all, many kudos for PDNS. A name server that doesn't require you to be
an Einstein to run!
Second of all, I apologize because this is only remotely related to PDNS, but
because I'm not a DNS expert I'm pulling my hair out. I've been searching for
almost three hours for an answer.
I'
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:38:53AM -0200, sysadmin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's possible setup recursor to point to a specific A record instead return
> a error, if a domain do not exist ?
Please look into the 'lua' scripts, they make this possible. Search for
'Lua' in the manual to see how this works
Hi,
It's possible setup recursor to point to a specific A record instead return
a error, if a domain do not exist ?
For example when a user made a typo in browser www.powerdnsss.com redirect
to a
webserver that will show a page with a "typo error message".
Regards,
Marlon
___
Ton van Rosmalen wrote:
Leen Besselink schreef:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:00:18AM -0800, Augie Schwer wrote:
Obviously; but that's being reactive; I was looking for something more
proactive. --Augie
I've not tested it, but I understand the u32 option is available on
Debian/Linux f
Hi,
same problem as in 2.9.21:
The AXFR does not work, if the zone contains any fancy-records:
Jan 28 11:12:36 AXFR of domain 'foo.bar' initiated by 127.0.0.1
Jan 28 11:12:36 Looking for SOA
Jan 28 11:12:36 Query: 'select content,ttl,prio,type,domain_id,name from
records where type='SOA' and nam
Leen Besselink schreef:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:00:18AM -0800, Augie Schwer wrote:
Obviously; but that's being reactive; I was looking for something more
proactive. --Augie
I've not tested it, but I understand the u32 option is available on Debian/Linux for exampl
Hi,
I have a problem with the new pdns-2.9.22.
I one domain the pdns will not detect the wildcard-entry:
Jan 28 10:29:04 Received a packet 36 bytes long from 127.0.0.1
Jan 28 10:29:04 DNSPacket copy constructor called!
Jan 28 10:29:04 Distributor has 5 threads available
Jan 28 10:29:04 Remote 12
16 matches
Mail list logo
