On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Brendan Oakley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sure why it would say it is not the master when it is, but the
> note that it is up to date means the serial on the slave is higher
> than the one on the master.
Nope, the serials are the same. I've double checked t
> "Mitchell" == Mitchell Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mitchell> In my SOA records I am specifying the serial as 0, which according to
the
Mitchell> documentation will cause PowerDNS to generate a serial for the domain
based
Mitchell> on the changed_date of the records.
That doesn't wor
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 01:43:32PM -0600, Darren Gamble wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Just to throw my two cents in here...
>
> > I'm not sure what to do now - it might be good for PowerDNS to set the
> 'rd'
> > bit in forwarded queries.
>
> We've been meaning to open up a trac ticket for this. Our
Hi Pawel,
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:52 AM, Pawel Sawicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have a pdns installation that is both a master and a slave (for
> different domains, of course). Unfortunately for some of the domains
> (the master is the BIND9) I get the following behavior (log extra
Hi.
I have a pdns installation that is both a master and a slave (for
different domains, of course). Unfortunately for some of the domains
(the master is the BIND9) I get the following behavior (log extract):
#v+
Received NOTIFY for example.com from X.X.X.X which is not a master
Received NOTIFY f
