On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:08:54PM -0400, Jeffrey Hathaway wrote:
> Guys what in gods name is this shit about, it has been running fine then
> suddenly this error. i tried uninstlal and reinstallin a newer version, and
> it still occurs. nothing has changed oin my system.
Hi Jeffrey. You are run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeffrey Hathaway wrote:
| Guys what in gods name is this shit about, it has been running fine then
| suddenly this error. i tried uninstlal and reinstallin a newer version,
| and it still occurs. nothing has changed oin my system.
Please include
~
Guys what in gods name is this shit about, it has been running fine then
suddenly this error. i tried uninstlal and reinstallin a newer version, and
it still occurs. nothing has changed oin my system.
pdns: Jul 09 16:21:42 This is a standalone pdns
Jul 09 16:21:42 Opened file '/etc/powerdns/pdns
Digg it here:
http://digg.com/security/Some_thoughts_on_the_recent_DNS_vulnerability
--Augie
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:46 PM, bert hubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some more personal notes on this issue can be found on
> http://blog.netherlabs.nl/articles/2008/07/09/some-thoughts-on-the-recent
Some more personal notes on this issue can be found on
http://blog.netherlabs.nl/articles/2008/07/09/some-thoughts-on-the-recent-dns-vulnerability
Bert
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:16:19PM +0200, bert hubert wrote:
> We're being approached from various angles about PowerDNS and the recently
Hi everybody,
We're being approached from various angles about PowerDNS and the recently
discovered DNS vulnerability (http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/800113 )
To clear up any possible confusion, I'd like to state that since 2006,
PowerDNS has not been vulnerable for the issue reported in CVE-2008
That's exactly what was going on! Thanks for clearing that up for me.
When I used the option "-t A" the SERVFAILs went away.
Thanks for your help,
Nick
Kees Monshouwer wrote:
Hello Nicholas,
Host on CentOS 5 is also doing a lookup for a and a MX record.
These records are missing in you
Hi Mauro
> This is, I think, the same as described in
> http://www.nabble.com/sqlite3-superslave---doesn%27t-work-td13827119.html
>
> In the thread referred to, someone sent a patch and the thread stops
> without stating whether it works or is accepted upstream, so I wanted
> to check for the stat
Hello Nicholas,
Host on CentOS 5 is also doing a lookup for a and a MX record.
These records are missing in your test zone.
Output tcpdump:
17:53:30.347753 IP 192.168.0.179.32795 > dns1.bondware.com.domain:
30025+ ? www.test.com. (30)
17:53:30.427114 IP dns1.bondware.com.domain > 19
I consistently get correct results with "dig" no matter what options I
choose (including +norecurs) but consistently get weird results with
"host" no matter what options I choose. *scratches head*
Thanks,
Nick
bert hubert wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 11:45:44AM -0500, Nicholas Williams wro
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 11:45:44AM -0500, Nicholas Williams wrote:
> I setup PowerDNS with a MySQL 5 backend on Centos 5 this morning. I put
> in the "test.com" example records that come in the PowerDNS user guide.
> When I perform a "host" query, as suggested in the guide, I get this:
Quick ans
I setup PowerDNS with a MySQL 5 backend on Centos 5 this morning. I put
in the "test.com" example records that come in the PowerDNS user guide.
When I perform a "host" query, as suggested in the guide, I get this:
$ host www.test.com localhost
Using domain server:
Name: localhost
Address: 127.0
remove chroot from your config file, or place socket into chroot
directory and point to the socket relative to chroot
2008/7/8 Paul Littlefield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have tried but get this error:-
>
> ./update
> Fatal: Unable to connect to remote '/var/run/pdns_recursor.controlsocket': No
> s
Hi everyone
When asking on the IRC channel yesterday 'ahu' told me to send the
request to the mailinglist. So here we go:
I run pdns 2.9.21, freebsd 7.0, sqlite 3.5.6, compiled from the
FreeBSD ports-tree. I try to have a bind9 host act as a hidden
supermaster for some zones. The supermas
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 09:03:57AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 06:13:04PM +0200,
> Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> a message of 13 lines which said:
>
> > > Microsoft will be releasing more details tonight,
> >
> > Apparently done:
> >
> > http
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 06:13:04PM +0200,
Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 13 lines which said:
> > Microsoft will be releasing more details tonight,
>
> Apparently done:
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS08-020.mspx
As mentioned off-line, th
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:26:47AM +0200, bert hubert wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 07:47:45AM +0200, Leen Besselink wrote:
> > So now the question becomes did anyone inform Bert and/or PowerDNS too ?
>
> I knew about this stuff from the very beginning (February I think), even
> before CERT was
17 matches
Mail list logo
