On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:49:34PM +0100, Bastian wrote:
> - Am I correct about PowerDNS not supporting AFSDB? (I tried and it
> seems it really doesn't).
Indeed
> - If so, will AFSDB support be added in the future?
Yes, soon, 2.9.21 which is being worked on right now will add *all* records
su
Hi,
I am using PowerDNS and OpenAFS (a distributed file system). OpenAFS
clients are capable of reading the names of the central servers from an
AFSDB record (instead of a file, that would be required on every
workstation). The AFSDB record is specified in RFC1183
The reply needed by OpenAF
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 04:36:05PM +0100, trietz wrote:
> When i start pdns in the monitor mode i can see it start to parse the
> zone files succesfully. The memory usage of pdns grows and when
> the system memory reach more than 4.5 gb the pdns process get killed
> with the following message:
Hi,
im try to test pdns to replace bind on our three nameservers. The main
job of these servers is to answer reverse lookups.
They handle a lot of zones. Bind takes 4.7 gb of memory. I use the bind
backend for pdns.
When i start pdns in the monitor mode i can see it start to parse the
zone f
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:24:41PM +0100, Massimo Bandinelli wrote:
> **
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -I../.. -D_GNU_SOURCE
> -I/usr/local/src/boost_1_33_1 -Wall -O2 -MT
> libbind2backend_la-bindparser.lo -MD -MP -MF
> .deps/libbind2backend_la-bindparser.Tpo -c bindparser.cc -fPIC
The static version of the snapshot returns me a segfault immediately
**
/etc/rc.d/rc.pdns-register start
Starting PowerDNS authoritative nameserver: /etc/rc.d/rc.pdns-register:
line 37: 28692 Segmentation fault $pdns_server --daemon
--guardian=yes
**
Compiling the snapshot I received
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 11:35:28AM +0100, Massimo Bandinelli wrote:
> I'm trying to replace bind with powerdns (2.9.20), because it's really
> faster in load and reload.
Massimo,
Have you tried our snapshot yet? http://svn.powerdns.com/snapshots/959/
should fix most BIND problems.
Bert
Peter Gervai schrieb:
On 3/2/07, Rudolph Bott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey folks,
ready to rumble:
you can check out a demo version of my web GUI at
nice.
Sidenotes:
1) 10.11.12.500 IP is nice ;-)
What exactly do you mean?
2) SOA values should not be specified (primaryNS and hostmaster
Hello,
I'm trying to replace bind with powerdns (2.9.20), because it's really
faster in load and reload.
I'm trying using the bind (2) backend and just over 300,000 zones.
I find that pdns will return a "segmentation fault" randomly on me
generally during a bind-reload-now command. Any help in
d
[It *seems* that the name servers are PowerDNS machines, hence the
message.]
Sourceforge currently experiences DNS problems (they claim it is a
DoS, http://sourceforge.net/docs/A04). Names like
echoping.svn.sourceforge.net cannot be resolved from most sites
(server failure, while you would expect
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 05:09, Devraj Mukherjee wrote:
> OpenDBX seems to report RCODE 3 when I try and do update the records
> in a slave DNS server. Any ideas?
>
> Mar 6 14:07:04 woody pdns[8246]: Backend error: Remote nameserver
> reported error: RCODE=3
> Mar 6 14:07:12 woody last message re
11 matches
Mail list logo
