Hi Norbert,
That's pretty nasty transaction-dumb behavior. Is that because
PowerDNS treats the MySQL driver as just an abstracted storage engine?
PDNS if its going to use transaction-safe databases, should create a
transaction abstraction layer that gets enforced when using an ACID
environment li
On Monday 26 February 2007 23:55, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 03:37:58PM -0700, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
> > It would be nice to have a config file option to enable/disable it. In
> > our environment, there are no zone transfers going on, and its more
> > important to recon
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 03:37:58PM -0700, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
> It would be nice to have a config file option to enable/disable it. In
> our environment, there are no zone transfers going on, and its more
> important to reconnect to maximize uptime. Also, PowerDNS should
> handle rollbacks
It would be nice to have a config file option to enable/disable it. In
our environment, there are no zone transfers going on, and its more
important to reconnect to maximize uptime. Also, PowerDNS should
handle rollbacks properly if its going to support InnoDB. In the event
of a rollback, either t
Hi Christian
> starting in MySQL 5.0.3 the reconnect-flag in the mysqlclientlib is set to
> 0 by default, which means no auto-reconnecting.
>
> Any ideas or plans to solve this? We found several "mysql server has gone
> away" in the logfile, while the server runs perfectly.
After reading http://d
Hello all,
We've noticed this behavior with PDNS as well...but did not know what
to attribute it to.
-J
On 2/26/07, Christian Kuehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
starting in MySQL 5.0.3 the reconnect-flag in the mysqlclientlib is set to 0 by
default, which means no auto-reconnecting.
Any id
Hi,
starting in MySQL 5.0.3 the reconnect-flag in the mysqlclientlib is set to 0 by
default, which means no auto-reconnecting.
Any ideas or plans to solve this? We found several "mysql server has gone away"
in the logfile, while the server runs perfectly.
Greets
Christian
--
Christian Kühn
(Te
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 01:53:54PM +0100, bert hubert wrote:
> > Wrong (and the use of "neglect" is not nice for the people who
> > reported it). I already gave a case where it is a problem, ENUM:
>
> Ah - but that is a different problem. In the previous message we discussed
> people who add a dom
> Wrong (and the use of "neglect" is not nice for the people who
> reported it). I already gave a case where it is a problem, ENUM:
Ah - but that is a different problem. In the previous message we discussed
people who add a domain to the domains table, but there is no SOA
record.
The empty non-te
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:19:05PM +0100,
bert hubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 23 lines which said:
> We still consider it difficult to fix and not important as it only
> "affects" people who provision domains but neglect to add records.
Wrong (and the use of "neglect" is not nic
10 matches
Mail list logo