On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Rob Sargent wrote:
> We would like to move to a more current version (20150822) but we have
> ongoing parallelizations. My assumption is that we need to wait for running
> invocations of parallel to complete before upgrading. Is that a correct
> assumption? Or
Thank you. (Once bitten, twice shy)
Somebody running something under parallel is pretty much a constant in our
group. (Citations to follow)
> On Oct 18, 2015, at 6:29 PM, Ole Tange wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Rob Sargent wrote:
>
>> We would like to move to a more current v
