Re: Alternate termination sequence option --term-seq

2015-04-29 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
On Wed, Apr 29 2015, Ole Tange wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Martin d'Anjou > wrote: >> On 15-04-27 05:06 PM, Ole Tange wrote: >>> >>> This you have to elaborate. Explain how this --termseq is executed >>> (with special emphasis on process groups): >>> >>> --termseq HUP,2,TERM,10,TER

Re: Alternate termination sequence option --term-seq

2015-04-29 Thread Ole Tange
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29 2015, Ole Tange wrote: > >> This still has the risk of killing an innocent PID and its children. > > Killing (in the sense of sending any signal whatsoever) an > innocent/unrelated PID is completely unacceptable, IMO. On a

Re: Alternate termination sequence option --term-seq

2015-04-29 Thread Martin d'Anjou
On 15-04-29 03:32 PM, Ole Tange wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: On Wed, Apr 29 2015, Ole Tange wrote: This still has the risk of killing an innocent PID and its children. Killing (in the sense of sending any signal whatsoever) an innocent/unrelated PID is co