Re: New behavior proposal --halt -% with job killing

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > How about > allowing --halt be given multiple times, with each invocation overriding > certain aspects of the behaviour requested so far. Then one could do > > --halt 25% --halt 2 > > with --halt 25% --halt 1 being the same as --halt 25%

Re: New behavior proposal --halt -% with job killing

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Martin d'Anjou wrote: Good summary: > You could come up with many options here: > > When to halt: > --halt [condition for halt] > --timeout [condition for halt is an amount of time] > --memfree [condition for halt is an amount of memory] > kill -TERM [condition f

Re: New behavior proposal --halt -% with job killing

On Sat, Apr 25 2015, Ole Tange wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Rasmus Villemoes > wrote: > >> How about >> allowing --halt be given multiple times, with each invocation overriding >> certain aspects of the behaviour requested so far. Then one could do >> >> --halt 25% --halt 2 >> >> w

Re: Alternate termination sequence option --term-seq

On 15-04-23 05:56 PM, Ole Tange wrote: On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Martin d'Anjou wrote: Here is an implementation of how the user can specify an alternate termination sequence: https://github.com/martinda/gnu-parallel/compare/optional-termination-sequ

Re: New behavior proposal --halt -% with job killing

On 15-04-25 03:25 AM, Ole Tange wrote: On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Martin d'Anjou wrote: Good summary: You could come up with many options here: When to halt: --halt [condition for halt] --timeout [condition for halt is an amount of time] --memfree [condition for halt is an amount of me