On 24 July 2014 19:24, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Martin Møller Skarbiniks Pedersen
> wrote:
> > try remove the -j +0 parameter.
>
> If I am not wrong, "-j +0" should be the same thing as no -j, right?
> But just in case, testing without -j the problem is exa
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> find $TILEDIR -type f -name "*.png" | \
> parallel --env optimize -j +0 --eta optimize
>
> But there is one problem: parallel starts to eat all my RAM and I just
> can't run it.
>From the man page:
--etaShow the
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Rob Sargent wrote:
> I would like to react to each job's completion. I need to accumulate the
> data from each run and decide whether or not it's worth while to continue
> with the remaining jobs. I don't think pipe is what I want, but maybe I'm
> misunderstanding
On 07/25/2014 06:27 AM, Ole Tange wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Rob Sargent wrote:
I would like to react to each job's completion. I need to accumulate the
data from each run and decide whether or not it's worth while to continue
with the remaining jobs. I don't think pipe is what I
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Rob Sargent wrote:
> Thanks, yes that might be an option though much must conveyed in "$1". I'm
> currently trying a java alternative on this same theme, the meat of which
> may morph into "analyze output".
You are aware that $1 has a whole family:
doit() {
On 07/25/2014 12:35 PM, Ole Tange wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Rob Sargent wrote:
Thanks, yes that might be an option though much must conveyed in "$1". I'm
currently trying a java alternative on this same theme, the meat of which
may morph into "analyze output".
You are aware tha
