Re: controlling memory use beyond --noswap

2014-05-07 Thread Sebastian Eiser
Just a thought, which may be a simple solution, but suiting most people. The kernel is pretty good at killing misbehaving jobs. @Ole: can you capture SIGKILL from a job? Can you record memory usage shortly after SIGKILL? If yes, you have an estimate on the minimum memory requirement of the job an

Re: controlling memory use beyond --noswap

2014-05-07 Thread B. Franz Lang
Hi Sebastian we do need swap to permit finishing of jobs in some exceptional instances, and then lots of it. On the other hand, use of swap should be really avoided as it slows down jobs to a crawl, and eats up disks. I am not convinced to go this route. i.e. let the kernel kill already misbeha