On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Manuel Landesfeind
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am aware of the reason using "-E" and I was thinking that it is absolutely
> necessary. This is the reason why I would recommend a "die". But rsync 2.6.7
> is a very old version (year 2006) and from my point of view it is ok no
Hi,
I am aware of the reason using "-E" and I was thinking that it is
absolutely necessary. This is the reason why I would recommend a "die".
But rsync 2.6.7 is a very old version (year 2006) and from my point of
view it is ok not support it. Nevertheless I performed the checks you
wanted (se
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 15:10 +0100, Matt Oates (Home) wrote:
> On 12 May 2011 14:57, guerrier wrote:
> > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Matt Oates (Home)
> > wrote:
> >> Is parallel a great idea here?
> >
> > That's my real question. I have a failing hdd, from which i would
> > like to move as
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Matt Oates (Home) wrote:
> Hi Guerrier,
>
> On 11 May 2011 23:37, guerrier wrote:
>> Hello
>> Can one use parallel to speed up rsync -avz dir1 dir2 ? How would one
>> phrase that?
>
> Is parallel a great idea here?
That's my real question. I have a failing hdd,
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Ole Tange wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Matt Oates (Home)
> wrote:
> > On 12 May 2011 14:57, guerrier wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Matt Oates (Home)
> wrote:
> >>> Is parallel a great idea here?
> >>
> >> That's my real question. I
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Matt Oates (Home) wrote:
> On 12 May 2011 14:57, guerrier wrote:
>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Matt Oates (Home)
>> wrote:
>>> Is parallel a great idea here?
>>
>> That's my real question. I have a failing hdd, from which i would
>> like to move as much d
> Something like:
>
> find dir1 -type d | parallel -Xq ssh myhost mkdir -p dir2/'"{}"'
> find dir1 -type f | parallel rsync -az {} myhost:dir2/{}
I'll give it a try and report back.
