Re: [Pan-users] rules OR commentary

2025-04-02 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Monday, 31 March 2025 03:07:22 Central European Summer Time Duncan wrote: > Meanwhile, in my function as the de facto list "pan historian" as someone > once called me, I like that title 😃 > I noticed some time ago that the as-documented-in-original-clients OR > behavior seemed to be absent. O

Re: [Pan-users] Rules for rewriting title?

2007-02-13 Thread Guilhem Bonnefille
No matter at all. English is not my native langage, so I have lot of difficulties to make me understandable :-) On 2/13/07, Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Monday 12 Feb 2007 15:34, Guilhem Bonnefille wrote: > My idea is only to rename articles' titles. Sorry, Guilhem, I misunderstood your p

Re: [Pan-users] Rules for rewriting title?

2007-02-13 Thread Mike
On Monday 12 Feb 2007 15:34, Guilhem Bonnefille wrote: > My idea is only to rename articles' titles. Sorry, Guilhem, I misunderstood your point. -- Mike ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-use

Re: [Pan-users] Rules for rewriting title?

2007-02-12 Thread Douglas Bollinger
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:17:17 +0100 "Guilhem Bonnefille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm using Pan regurlarly now, and discovering the world of alt.binaries. > > I encounter a "problem" and whish to explain it in order to find ideas > to work around. > > Titles of binaries articles are very long

Re: [Pan-users] Rules for rewriting title?

2007-02-12 Thread Guilhem Bonnefille
My idea is only to rename articles' titles. Why? Because my display is not wide enougth for long titles and sometimes I'm unable to read usefull informations (because begining of the title are unecessary informations). For example in : Battlestar Galactica - 313 - DIVX - vostfr "battlestar.galac

Re: [Pan-users] Rules for rewriting title?

2007-02-12 Thread Mike
On Monday 12 Feb 2007 13:17, Guilhem Bonnefille wrote: > Titles of binaries articles are very long, with some redundant > informations and some informations not needed by human. I agree, that's a definite problem at times. If I understand your question correctly though it wouldn't be a good idea

Re: [Pan-users] Rules

2006-09-08 Thread K. Haley
Charles Kerr wrote: > IMO a simpler interface for this would be checkboxes in > Edit|Preferences|Behavior: > > [x] Automatically delete ignored articles > [x] Automatically fetch watched articles Aside from the UI there is a patch in bugzilla to automatically download watched articles. http://

Re: [Pan-users] Rules (was: Tools menu in Pan 0.111)

2006-09-08 Thread arndalebilo
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 01:16:15 +0930, Charles Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: arndalebilo wrote: That's what I've done with 0.110 and 0.111 - no more probs with the spell-check but no 'rules' etc. in the menus. I used a rule to automatically download articles for offline reading. Guess I

Re: [Pan-users] Rules (was: Tools menu in Pan 0.111)

2006-09-08 Thread Bruce Bowler
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 10:46:15 -0500 Charles Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> put fingers to keyboard and said: > > IMO a simpler interface for this would be checkboxes in > Edit|Preferences|Behavior: > >[x] Automatically delete ignored articles >[x] Automatically fetch watched articles YES!!! -