On Sun, 2 Jul 2006 12:41:19 -0600 (MDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Reiss) wrote:
> Personally I disagree...I think that's true for text newsreading, but
> when primarily using pan for binary harvesting it's really nice to be able
> to see which headers are new, since you don't actually read binary pos
> So anyway, you don't get the distinction between old unread and new
> messages that old-pan had, but neither Charles nor myself believe that's a
> big issue. Read/unread is good enough.
Personally I disagree...I think that's true for text newsreading, but
when primarily using pan for binary harv
On Sat, 1 Jul 2006 17:20:41 + (UTC)
"Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Douglas Bollinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 01 Jul 2006
> 08:00:39 -0400:
>
> > In the above case, "AMD patent about inverse hyperthreading" is
> > double-underlined. If
