Re: [Pan-users] Re: Bug squashed

2010-01-23 Thread K. Haley
On 1/22/2010 8:01 PM, Duncan wrote: > > What are the full requirements, now? > > I maintain a pan-999 "live" ebuild locally, and update the gentoo bug > with ebuild I contributed as necessary. Here's what I have for > dependencies now, after updating the above. In particular, has he updated > t

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Bug squashed

2010-01-22 Thread K. Haley
On 1/21/2010 12:22 AM, SciFi wrote: > Hi, > > Very sorry, other things keep getting in my way. :( > > I will need to do the tests over again, the cache etc here got cleaned-out. > > When I upgrade stuff, I did have a "cheat sheet" to go thru each (sub)project > in sequence, just like a pkg-mgr wou

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Bug squashed

2010-01-15 Thread K. Haley
On 1/14/2010 11:05 PM, SciFi wrote: > Hi, > > Yes you described my problem very closely (I suppose you can blame me for > instigating this ;) ). > > We have applied that simple one-line patch here, > (others are listed as bug-report numbers in my User-Agent header line), > compiled & installed it,

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Bug squashed

2010-01-08 Thread K. Haley
On 1/8/2010 12:07 AM, SciFi wrote: > Please do not mis-take this reply, I am only wondering --- > Your post appeared all by its lonesome self on gmane. ;) > Was your post suppose to go under the thread I began dealing with > "hav[ing] problems with some binary postings using yEnc" ? > > Honestl