Charles Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>This is a good patch. Thank you!
Thank you for the response! I was starting to worry that it went into
/dev/null...:-)
>Feel free to submit more if you like. :)
Already did, see the "Oscillating size-to-fit" message. Though I
wouldn't call that patch "
Per Hedeland wrote:
Hm, the overwhelming response to that made me go looking for a fix
myself:-) - patch for 0.106 below. The problem was that the handling of
invalid uu lines was broken (the troublesome posts that I've come across
had an extra empty line between the article header and the uu st
Darren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Per Hedeland wrote:
> > Hm, the overwhelming response to that made me go looking for a fix
>> myself:-) - patch for 0.106 below. The problem was that the handling of
>
>I actually meant to take a look and see if the occasional issue I see of
>pan seeing some att
Per Hedeland wrote:
> Hm, the overwhelming response to that made me go looking for a fix
> myself:-) - patch for 0.106 below. The problem was that the handling of
I actually meant to take a look and see if the occasional issue I see of
pan seeing some attachments as incomplete that other newsread
Per Hedeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I've noticed that for some pictures posted as multiple parts, pan will
>fail to display the complete picture - seems it only shows what is
>contained in the first part, with the rest black or occasionally
>containing garbled parts of other pictures (i.e. s
