On Sun 09 Aug 2009 at 20:56:42 +0200, Rhialto wrote:
> > > Last time I checked (which admittedly is quite a while ago), Pan's Yenc
> > > decoder is faulty. It just concatenates the binary parts it finds, with
> > > no regard to the byte ranges that are indicated for them. If the 3 parts
> > > have
> > Last time I checked (which admittedly is quite a while ago), Pan's Yenc
> > decoder is faulty. It just concatenates the binary parts it finds, with
> > no regard to the byte ranges that are indicated for them. If the 3 parts
> > have overlapping ranges, Pan would mis-decode them. (If a part is
On Sun 09 Aug 2009 at 18:50:15 +0100, Paul Crawford wrote:
disk. Rather as if pan has dropped/inserted the odd byte or two in
combining the parts. I have seen this on other large images as well.
Last time I checked (which admittedly is quite a while ago), Pan's Yenc
decoder is faulty. It just
- Original Message -
From: "Rhialto"
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2009 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Pan-users] Error saving large JPEG image
> On Sun 09 Aug 2009 at 18:50:15 +0100, Paul Crawford wrote:
>> disk. Rather as if pan has dropped/inserted the odd byte or two in
On Sun 09 Aug 2009 at 18:50:15 +0100, Paul Crawford wrote:
> disk. Rather as if pan has dropped/inserted the odd byte or two in
> combining the parts. I have seen this on other large images as well.
Last time I checked (which admittedly is quite a while ago), Pan's Yenc
decoder is faulty. It ju
