On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 00:43:29 +, Duncan wrote:
>> Another direction is to just keep the socket to Leafnode open, and then
>> if it gets closed inadvertently, just open a new connection. Does that
>> seem at all reasonable? I would prefer to deal with individual
>> messages only at the level o
Thufir posted on Wed, 04 Apr 2012 08:49:02 -0700 as excerpted:
> I'm playing around with gnu.mail.providers.nntp.NNTPMessage and it
> behaves in an unanticipated way -- but as documented.
>
> If the store is closed this invalidates the messages, so the NNTPMessage
> is only useful when connected
I'm playing around with gnu.mail.providers.nntp.NNTPMessage and it
behaves in an unanticipated way -- but as documented.
If the store is closed this invalidates the messages, so the NNTPMessage
is only useful when connected to the server. I'm only connecting to
leafnode on localhost.
Without
