Re: [Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up

2012-06-19 Thread Duncan
Steve Davies posted on Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:21:26 +0100 as excerpted: > I object to the wasted line. What I do is the style from the first > C-programming book I ever read. It just stuck. Heh, what I do is the style from most shell script functions I've seen, without the wasted line. =:^) The fi

Re: [Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up

2012-06-19 Thread Steve Davies
On 19 June 2012 01:30, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Travis posted on Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:35:38 -0700 as excerpted: > >> Steve Davies posted: >>> In the meantime, I am attaching a patch which improves things a lot for >>> me... > >> How do we not techie/coder types use this patch? > > I'm

Re: [Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up

2012-06-19 Thread Steve Davies
On 19 June 2012 00:23, walt wrote: > On 06/18/2012 10:24 AM, Steve Davies wrote: [pseudo code redacted to avoid conflict] > > I fixed your lousy c formatting style for you ;) > > I think maybe our preferences between the two different styles > are hardwired into our brains or something.  Reminds

Re: [Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up

2012-06-18 Thread Heinrich Müller
Am Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:33:16 +0100 schrieb Steve Davies: > > In the meantime, I am attaching a patch which improves things a lot for > me... > > Hope it helps others too. > > Cheers, > Steve ___ Hi Steve. Thanks for the patch, pushed to master. Cheer

Re: [Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up

2012-06-18 Thread Duncan
Travis posted on Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:35:38 -0700 as excerpted: > Steve Davies posted: >> In the meantime, I am attaching a patch which improves things a lot for >> me... > How do we not techie/coder types use this patch? I'm not a coder but do claim to be a techie, and run gentoo, which default

Re: [Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up

2012-06-18 Thread walt
On 06/18/2012 10:24 AM, Steve Davies wrote: > while ( complie errors > 0 ) > { >scratch head >use google >flounder a bit >fix errors > } I fixed your lousy c formatting style for you ;) I think maybe our preferences between the two different styles are hardwired into our brains or

Re: [Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up

2012-06-18 Thread Travis
-Original Message- From: Steve Davies Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 1:33 PM To: pan-users@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up On 18 June 2012 21:26, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: Steve Davies posted on Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:39:07 +0100 as excerpted:

Re: [Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up

2012-06-18 Thread Steve Davies
On 18 June 2012 21:26, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Steve Davies posted on Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:39:07 +0100 as excerpted: > >> I am closing in on part of the issue. It MIGHT be that it does not like >> using a non-standard port number in servers.xml. My news server provides >> TLS secured

Re: [Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up

2012-06-18 Thread Duncan
Steve Davies posted on Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:39:07 +0100 as excerpted: > I am closing in on part of the issue. It MIGHT be that it does not like > using a non-standard port number in servers.xml. My news server provides > TLS secured NNTP on port 443 for convenience. If I enable that, I can be > sur

Re: [Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up

2012-06-18 Thread Steve Davies
On 18 June 2012 17:18, Heinrich Müller wrote: > Am Mon, 18 Jun 2012 08:56:29 +0100 schrieb Steve Davies: > >> This build does seem quite unstable under Win32, and on a Unix system I >> know exactly how to debug it, but under MinGW??? >> >> It would appear that it is getting part way through the fi

Re: [Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up

2012-06-18 Thread Steve Davies
On 18 June 2012 17:31, Heinrich Müller wrote: > Am Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:07:28 +0100 schrieb Steve Davies: > >> As the title says, the usual location now has a 0.138 Pan Win32 build >> with Spelling and TLS enabled. >> >>     http://sites.google.com/site/paninstall/ >> >> I did manage to crash it on

Re: [Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up

2012-06-18 Thread Heinrich Müller
Am Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:07:28 +0100 schrieb Steve Davies: > As the title says, the usual location now has a 0.138 Pan Win32 build > with Spelling and TLS enabled. > > http://sites.google.com/site/paninstall/ > > I did manage to crash it once, so have flagged it experimental, but TLS > seems t

Re: [Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up

2012-06-18 Thread Heinrich Müller
Am Mon, 18 Jun 2012 08:56:29 +0100 schrieb Steve Davies: > This build does seem quite unstable under Win32, and on a Unix system I > know exactly how to debug it, but under MinGW??? > > It would appear that it is getting part way through the files/configs > saving process, and failing, leaving a

Re: [Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up

2012-06-18 Thread Steve Davies
On 18 June 2012 01:03, Travis wrote: > -Original Message- From: Steve Davies > Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2012 4:07 PM > To: pan-users@nongnu.org > Subject: [Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up > > > As the title says, the usual location now has a 0.138 Pan Win32 build &g

Re: [Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up

2012-06-17 Thread Travis
-Original Message- From: Steve Davies Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2012 4:07 PM To: pan-users@nongnu.org Subject: [Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up As the title says, the usual location now has a 0.138 Pan Win32 build with Spelling and TLS enabled. http://sites.google.com/site

[Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up

2012-06-17 Thread Steve Davies
As the title says, the usual location now has a 0.138 Pan Win32 build with Spelling and TLS enabled. http://sites.google.com/site/paninstall/ I did manage to crash it once, so have flagged it experimental, but TLS seems to be working okay. I think I probably crashed it by reconfiguring a serv