On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 20:43:46 +0100, Brian Morrison via Pan-users wrote:
[...]
> I think that Fedora decided to orphan Pan a while ago because the
> maintainer stopped maintaining it.
>
> I have been able to get it working on Fedora 40 up to pan-0.158, I build
> rpms locally from source usi
Detlef Graef via Pan-users posted on Wed, 14 Aug 2024 09:18:05 +0200 as
excerpted:
> You can install a newer version of Pan for Fedora from here:
>
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/dgraef/Pan/
>
> At the moment version 0.159 is avaliable. I will update it to 0.160 when
> I will have tim
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 09:18:05 +0200
Detlef Graef via Pan-users wrote:
> There is an open issue regarding updating Pan for Fedora:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144254
>
> But I'm in doubt if it will be fixed.
We can try. I've added a comment about version 0.160 to the bug.
>
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 18:33:12 - (UTC)
Beartooth via Pan-users wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 15:19:47 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
>
> > I happy to announce the release of Pan 0.160 codename "Toresk"
>
> I seem to have hit a snag that's over my head. I run Fedora,
> currently fc40,
On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 15:19:47 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> I happy to announce the release of Pan 0.160 codename "Toresk"
I seem to have hit a snag that's over my head. I run Fedora,
currently fc40, updating it daily. I've been assuming that included
updating Pan, which I check a cou