Re: [Pan-users] SSL/TSL and Linux pan 0.139

2014-02-28 Thread Mike Brown
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 07:41:51PM +, RW wrote: > I suspect that in the long-term it would be less trouble to deinstall > and use stunnel. That way he gets updates through the packaging > system, and doesn't have to rebuild manually for security updates, > library changes etc. Thanks. I'll me

Re: [Pan-users] SSL/TSL and Linux pan 0.139

2014-02-28 Thread RW
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 11:01:29 -0600 Mike Brown wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 04:38:41PM +, RW wrote: > > IMO the benefit of having TLS/SSL support in a newsreader is > > pretty small. It's so easy to setup stunnel to handle it and just > > point the newsreader at one or more localhost ports.

Re: [Pan-users] SSL/TSL and Linux pan 0.139

2014-02-28 Thread Mike Brown
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 04:38:41PM +, RW wrote: > IMO the benefit of having TLS/SSL support in a newsreader is > pretty small. It's so easy to setup stunnel to handle it and just point > the newsreader at one or more localhost ports. True. He downloaded the source and compiled it. It is work

Re: [Pan-users] SSL/TSL and Linux pan 0.139

2014-02-28 Thread RW
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:44:19 -0600 Mike Brown wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 06:21:34AM +, Duncan wrote: > > I believe you mean that you were told that TLS/SSL was *NOT* > > supported in 0.133 yet, correct? > > Sorry, I did indeed mean "not supported." Brain fart. > > Thanks for the expla

Re: [Pan-users] SSL/TSL and Linux pan 0.139

2014-02-23 Thread Mike Brown
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 06:21:34AM +, Duncan wrote: > I believe you mean that you were told that TLS/SSL was *NOT* supported in > 0.133 yet, correct? Sorry, I did indeed mean "not supported." Brain fart. Thanks for the explanation as to what is going on. I will pass on the info. He will ha

Re: [Pan-users] SSL/TSL and Linux pan 0.139

2014-02-23 Thread Duncan
Mike Brown posted on Sun, 23 Feb 2014 21:15:11 -0600 as excerpted: > I have 0.133 on my Linux system, as it is an older version of Fedora. I > also have it un my XP laptop, but it is version 0.139. > > On the Linux system I was told that TSL/SSL was supported in 0.133 yet. > It is in the 0.139 th

[Pan-users] SSL/TSL and Linux pan 0.139

2014-02-23 Thread Mike Brown
I have 0.133 on my Linux system, as it is an older version of Fedora. I also have it un my XP laptop, but it is version 0.139. On the Linux system I was told that TSL/SSL was supported in 0.133 yet. It is in the 0.139 that I have on the XP box. But, my friend loaded 0.139, via yum, on his latest

[Pan-users] SSL/TSL and Linux pan 0.139

2014-02-23 Thread Mike Brown
I have 0.133 on my Linux system, as it is an older version of Fedora. I also have it un my XP laptop, but it is version 0.139. On the Linux system I was told that TSL/SSL was supported in 0.133 yet. It is in the 0.139 that I have on the XP box. But, my friend loaded 0.139, via yum, on his latest