wayne posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Sun, 07
Aug 2005 22:46:51 -0700:
> This explains a lot about pan's behavior. Thanks. I looks like a problem
> for all newsreaders. The method I use to determine if there is a binary
> attachment is to examine "lines". If it's over 1,000, t
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> responded:
>> I've been using pan for a number of years and love it. One thing
>> that has always bothered me about it though is that I cannot view
>> the attachment name(s). Is there any way to do that? Sometimes
>> I'd like to know what it is before saving it to dis
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:22:34 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> There is no such functionality at this point, other than directly viewing
> the source of the post (saving that, or opening it from the cache), and
> gleaning the attachment name and other particulars from the raw post.
> However, I too would fin
wayne posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Mon, 25
Jul 2005 11:37:49 -0700:
> I've been using pan for a number of years and love it. One thing
> that has always bothered me about it though is that I cannot view
> the attachment name(s). Is there any way to do that? Sometimes
> I'd l
