- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Bowler"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 10:56 AM
Subject: [Pan-users] Re: Temporarily dead server
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:34:19 -0800, Travis wrote:
>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Duncan" <1i
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:34:19 -0800, Travis wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Duncan" <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> To:
> Sent: Tuesday,
> January 13, 2009 06:45 AM Subject: [Pan-users] Re: Temporarily dead
> server
>
>
>> Phil Grundig
- Original Message -
From: "Duncan" <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 06:45 AM
Subject: [Pan-users] Re: Temporarily dead server
> Phil Grundig posted
> 513125.82668...@web26403.mail.ukl.yahoo.com, excerpted below, on Tue, 13
>
Phil Grundig posted
513125.82668...@web26403.mail.ukl.yahoo.com, excerpted below, on Tue, 13
Jan 2009 10:56:06 +:
> Checkboxes/ticks to disable/enable a server would be an entirely
> sensible (and obvious) usability feature to add.
>
> I certainly never would have guessed the '0' connection
Thanks to all for your suggestions none of which, unfortunately, work.
Phil has the right idea to add a check box to ignore the server, but
since there haven't been any updates in some large number of months (18?)
I'm not holding my breath...
Oh well...
Bruce
--
+---+
nfirmation dialog asking if all information about a server (including
group list) should be deleted if the server is removed from the server list.
If 1. got done that would probably be enough,
--- On Tue, 13/1/09, SciFi wrote:
> From: SciFi
> Subject: [Pan-users] Re: Temporarily dead server
Hi,
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:47:41 +, Bruce Bowler wrote:
>
> One of the servers that I get articles from is "dead", (hopefully only
> temporarily). As a result, pan "hangs" for quite some time when I exit
> pan, waiting for the network connection to fail. Is there a way to tell
> pan to "no
