Thomas Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>On Tuesday 18 April 2006 13:09, Duncan wrote:
>
>> Note that gcc is slotted. You can therefore unmask 4.1.0 and merge it, if
>> desired, and use gcc-config/eselect to switch between versions. I /know/
>> 4.1.0 compiles it just fine -- and in less than a
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 13:09, Duncan wrote:
> Note that gcc is slotted. You can therefore unmask 4.1.0 and merge it, if
> desired, and use gcc-config/eselect to switch between versions. I /know/
> 4.1.0 compiles it just fine -- and in less than a third of a gig of
> memory, too!
Me wrote:
>
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 13:09, Duncan wrote:
> There's a gcc-3.4.6-r1 out with a few bugfixes. Maybe that is one of
> them? Something tells me this is likely a bug with 3.4.6, as yeah, 4.1
> might be more efficient, but 1.3 gig compared to 0.3 gig? That looks like
> a bug to me.
Just installe
Thomas Stein posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:58:39 +0200:
> On Friday 14 April 2006 16:52, Duncan wrote:
>
>> Well, when you get back... I just tried compiling it with gcc-3.4.6, and
>> yes, it /does/ use that memory.
>
> Hola.
>
> My ulimit is set to unlim
Thomas Stein posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Thu, 13 Apr 2006 11:21:26 +0200:
> On Thursday 13 April 2006 11:05, Duncan wrote:
>
>> What USE flags did you (previously) use when compiling PAN (the new one
>> doesn't have USE flags). nls? spell? Here, I'm -nls, +spell.
>
> Min
