On Friday 14 April 2006 16:52, Duncan wrote:
> Well, when you get back... I just tried compiling it with gcc-3.4.6, and
> yes, it /does/ use that memory. I normally have my ulimit -v (virtual
> memory limit, total a single process is allowed to use, including swap)
> set to a gigabyte (1048576 K
Duncan posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below,
on Fri, 14 Apr 2006 07:52:14 -0700:
> I'll bump the ulimit in tenths of a gig at a time, and see what happens,
> posting back when I get some numbers.
OK, gcc-3.4.6 will compile pan-0.92 from portage on amd64, with a 1.3 gig
ulimit -v, but not
Thomas Stein posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Thu, 13 Apr 2006 19:33:48 +0200:
> On Thursday 13 April 2006 18:39, Thomas Fricke wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> > This is the point where the compilation stops:
>> >
>> >
>> > then mv -f ".deps/scorefile-test.Tpo" ".deps/scorefile-test.Po";
On Thursday 13 April 2006 11:05, Duncan wrote:
> What USE flags did you (previously) use when compiling PAN (the new one
> doesn't have USE flags). nls? spell? Here, I'm -nls, +spell.
Mine was +nls +spell.
> Do you
> have the latest GTK/Gnome dependencies merged? Try an --update --deep
> -
Thomas Stein posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Thu, 13 Apr 2006 09:32:53 +0200:
> On Wednesday 12 April 2006 17:27, Duncan wrote:
>
>> I'd guess at this point that one of the above upgrades, automake,
>> autoconf, sandbox, and binutils, will fix the problem,
>
> Done. But..sa
