[Pan-users] Re: Odd accel behaviour - fixed

2009-10-20 Thread Jim Henderson
Agh, hit send too soon. ;-) On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:53:02 +, Duncan wrote: > I > was really getting puzzled given that you indicated it was /not/ simply > due to commenting it out, about like I was when all the reports started > coming in about pan being so slow with gnome... that (was it you

[Pan-users] Re: Odd accel behaviour - fixed

2009-10-20 Thread Jim Henderson
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:53:02 +, Duncan wrote: >> OK, so I just tried changing it and that didn't work either, and then >> the lightbulb came on: The defaults written out are all commented out. >> I removed the "; " at the beginning of the line and now it's working as >> expected. > > Wasn't

[Pan-users] Re: Odd accel behaviour - fixed

2009-10-20 Thread Duncan
Jim Henderson posted on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:38:18 + as excerpted: > OK, so I just tried changing it and that didn't work either, and then > the lightbulb came on: The defaults written out are all commented out. > I removed the "; " at the beginning of the line and now it's working as > expec

[Pan-users] Re: Odd accel behaviour - fixed

2009-10-20 Thread Jim Henderson
OK, so I just tried changing it and that didn't work either, and then the lightbulb came on: The defaults written out are all commented out. I removed the "; " at the beginning of the line and now it's working as expected. PEBKAC strikes again. Jim -- Jim Henderson Please keep on-topic r

[Pan-users] Re: Odd accel behaviour

2009-10-20 Thread Jim Henderson
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:03:51 +, Duncan wrote: > Actually, yes, altho I thought it read it at open and wrote it at close, > but it sounds like it writes it back out immediately, from what you > wrote. It's about 5000 lines later in the strace file (total line count for an open, get all new he

[Pan-users] Re: Odd accel behaviour

2009-10-20 Thread Duncan
Jim Henderson posted on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:25:21 + as excerpted: > So running an strace on it, I can see that it opens the accels.txt file > and reads it fine, but then for some reason (not really explained by a > quick scan of the strace log file I created) pan recreates the > accels.txt fil

[Pan-users] Re: Odd accel behaviour

2009-10-20 Thread Jim Henderson
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:07:06 +, Jim Henderson wrote: > I may have to run strace against pan to see if I can tell why it's > changing the file - or at least where it's changing it. So running an strace on it, I can see that it opens the accels.txt file and reads it fine, but then for some rea

[Pan-users] Re: Odd accel behaviour

2009-10-20 Thread Jim Henderson
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:50:53 +, Duncan wrote: > Jim Henderson posted on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:22:25 + as excerpted: > >> Tried that; it recreated it but I still don't have that option. > > That's just weird. You're using the right accels.txt, under ~/.pan2/ > unless you've pointed pan els

[Pan-users] Re: Odd accel behaviour

2009-10-20 Thread Duncan
Jim Henderson posted on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:22:25 + as excerpted: > Tried that; it recreated it but I still don't have that option. That's just weird. You're using the right accels.txt, under ~/.pan2/ unless you've pointed pan elsewhere by setting the PAN_HOME environmental variable, corre

[Pan-users] Re: Odd accel behaviour

2009-10-20 Thread Jim Henderson
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:31:25 +, Duncan wrote: > Hmm... my custom scheme uses T for thread/threading here, alt-t for > thread-headers... > > I long ago lost track of what the default for that is, but do you use > the defaults, or a custom scheme? I'm working with the defaults. CTRL-E is suppo

[Pan-users] Re: Odd accel behaviour

2009-10-20 Thread Duncan
Jim Henderson posted on Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:10:10 + as excerpted: > I've just noticed that the option to unthread headers (View->Headers- >>Thread Headers) lost its accel mapping of CTRL-E on my system. > > I modified accels.txt and tried to add it back, but when starting Pan, > the accel is