"Charles Kerr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:22:02 -0500:
> Duncan is absolutely right about -g, though I'd go further and recommend
> adding -ggdb3 to your CFLAGS before compiling glib/atk/pango/gtk/gmime.
Only to be fair it wasn't me but
"walt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:18:22
+:
> I suspect there is a gentoo way to add the -g flag for just
> one emerge (without changing the system-wide default), but I
> don't know what it is. Duncan?
Yes. Environment overrides make
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:15:54 -0400, Douglas Bollinger wrote:
.
.
.
> Ok guys, I compiled gtk+ without the -fomit-frame-pointer flag...
>
> (gdb) run
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0xb7e9ce0e in gtk_tree_view_set_fixed_height_mode ()...
The problem I see is that those big hexadecimal numbers, like
0xb7e9ce0e, a
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:09:46 + (UTC)
"Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For x86 (and therefore for 32-bit x86 compatible code on amd64), omitting
> the frame-pointer DOES affect debugging, but ONLY on the libraries and
> executables where the flag is used. (As a result it's not enabled by
Douglas Bollinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 21 Aug 2006
18:01:18 -0400:
> Does having my entire system (and espcially the gtk libs) compiled with
> -fomit-frame-pointer pretty much render my system useless for debugging?
I don't claim to be a "coding
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:01:18 -0400, Douglas Bollinger wrote:
.
.
.
> Does having my entire system (and espcially the gtk libs) compiled with
> -fomit-frame-pointer pretty much render my system useless for debugging?
That's what I've read, yes. OTOH, man gcc says that -fomit-frame-pointer
is auto
