[Pan-users] Re: A better test patch for wrapping in 0.124's post window

2007-02-18 Thread walt
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:31:12 +, Artur Jachacy wrote: > On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:38:45 -0600, Charles Kerr wrote: > >> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=82778 has something >> resembling a candidate for a 0.125 fix. I'd like to get some feedback >> on it first, though. Anyone care to

[Pan-users] Re: A better test patch for wrapping in 0.124's post window

2007-02-18 Thread walt
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:31:12 +, Artur Jachacy wrote: > On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:38:45 -0600, Charles Kerr wrote: > >> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=82778 has something >> resembling a candidate for a 0.125 fix. I'd like to get some feedback >> on it first, though. Anyone care

[Pan-users] Re: A better test patch for wrapping in 0.124's post window

2007-02-18 Thread Artur Jachacy
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:38:45 -0600, Charles Kerr wrote: > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=82778 has something > resembling a candidate for a 0.125 fix. I'd like to get some feedback > on it first, though. Anyone care to give it a spin? Signature delimiter is fine, empty lines are

[Pan-users] Re: A better test patch for wrapping in 0.124's post window

2007-02-17 Thread Jack Cuyler
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:38:45 -0600, Charles Kerr wrote: > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=82778 has something > resembling a candidate for a 0.125 fix. I'd like to get some feedback > on it first, though. Anyone care to give it a spin? I guess I should type a long-ish line to actu