Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.99999999999999

2011-06-18 Thread K. Haley
On 06/16/2011 02:23 PM, Duncan wrote: > SciFi posted on Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:56:25 + as excerpted: > >> On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:19:22 +0200, Rhialto wrote: >>> Speaking of git, did the repository at >>> git://github.com/lostcoder/pan2.git change history subtly at some >>> point? >> I don't know m

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.99999999999999

2011-06-17 Thread Duncan
Ron Johnson posted on Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:59:41 -0500 as excerpted: > On 06/17/2011 09:06 AM, Duncan wrote: > [snip] >> FWIW, it shouldn't require them for that. It'd either be a hard >> dependency, pulled in when pan is installed, or not required, as pan's >> decoding is built-in. (I haven't lo

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.99999999999999

2011-06-17 Thread Ron Johnson
On 06/17/2011 09:06 AM, Duncan wrote: [snip] FWIW, it shouldn't require them for that. It'd either be a hard dependency, pulled in when pan is installed, or not required, as pan's decoding is built-in. (I haven't looked in awhile, but IIRC it includes its own slightly modified copy of IDR which

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.99999999999999

2011-06-17 Thread Duncan
robby posted on Fri, 17 Jun 2011 05:35:13 + as excerpted: > I have no idea how that showed up as part of my sig. Have to make a new > pot of French Market coffee and ponder about it. ... Because anything posted below the sig delimiter ("-- " on its own line) is considered sig, by pan. Since

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.99999999999999

2011-06-17 Thread Duncan
robby posted on Fri, 17 Jun 2011 04:39:44 + as excerpted: > I am running Mint 9, 10 and 11, found the ppa for pan, and have > installed the 0.135 release on all three. Something I found via dumbly > searching through synaptic was that on the earlier releases, if I > installed "yydecode" > I c

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.99999999999999

2011-06-16 Thread robby
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 04:39:44 +, robby wrote: > Sorry about the HTML, was using Tbird, and did not realize that it was > set for that format. > > I am running Mint 9, 10 and 11, found the ppa for pan, and have > installed the 0.135 release on all three. Something I found via dumbly > searchin

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.99999999999999

2011-06-16 Thread robby
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:27:34 -0500, Bob Davenport wrote: > Will there ever be the possibility of uploading binaries in Pan? > > As far as I can tell, there is no application that allows binary > uploading under Linux. I know that Agent can be run under wine, been > there, done that. But with th

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.99999999999999

2011-06-16 Thread Duncan
SciFi posted on Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:56:25 + as excerpted: > On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:19:22 +0200, Rhialto wrote: >> >> Speaking of git, did the repository at >> git://github.com/lostcoder/pan2.git change history subtly at some >> point? > > I don't know myself of this particular problem. > But

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.99999999999999

2011-06-16 Thread Duncan
Rhialto posted on Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:33:03 +0200 as excerpted: > On Thu 16 Jun 2011 at 16:19:22 +0200, Rhialto wrote: >> Any ideas about what could have happened? > > Hmmm it looks like K. Haley's fixes have been rebased. This commit: I (gmane) seems to be missing your original post as you quot

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.99999999999999

2011-06-16 Thread SciFi
Hi, On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:19:22 +0200, Rhialto wrote: > > On Thu 16 Jun 2011 at 06:21:50 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: >> Somewhere in this month's list archives is mention of a git branch >> with binary uploads. > > Speaking of git, did the repository at > git://github.com/lostcoder/pan2.git chan

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.99999999999999

2011-06-16 Thread Duncan
Rhialto posted on Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:19:22 +0200 as excerpted: > On Thu 16 Jun 2011 at 06:21:50 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: >> Somewhere in this month's list archives is mention of a git branch with >> binary uploads. > > Speaking of git, did the repository at > git://github.com/lostcoder/pan2.git

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.99999999999999

2011-06-16 Thread Rhialto
On Thu 16 Jun 2011 at 06:21:50 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > Somewhere in this month's list archives is mention of a git branch > with binary uploads. Speaking of git, did the repository at git://github.com/lostcoder/pan2.git change history subtly at some point? It happened multiple times now that

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.99999999999999

2011-06-16 Thread Rhialto
On Thu 16 Jun 2011 at 16:19:22 +0200, Rhialto wrote: > Any ideas about what could have happened? Hmmm it looks like K. Haley's fixes have been rebased. This commit: Author: K. Haley 2009-06-21 08:43:32 Committer: K. Haley 2009-12-27 02:03:36 Parent: 116e9fc9acaa35bc37eed0f9c492e9a92384b903 (U

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.99999999999999

2011-06-16 Thread Duncan
Bob Davenport posted on Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:27:34 -0500 as excerpted: > Will there ever be the possibility of uploading binaries in Pan? > > As far as I can tell, there is no application that allows binary > uploading under Linux. I know that Agent can be run under wine, been > there, done that.

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.99999999999999

2011-06-16 Thread Ron Johnson
On 06/16/2011 02:27 AM, Bob Davenport wrote: Will there ever be the possibility of uploading binaries in Pan? As far as I can tell, there is no application that allows binary uploading under Linux. I know that Agent can be run under wine, been there, done that. But with the 1680 x 1050 screen re

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.99999999999999

2011-06-16 Thread Heinrich Mueller
On 06/16/11 09:27, Bob Davenport wrote: Will there ever be the possibility of uploading binaries in Pan? As far as I can tell, there is no application that allows binary uploading under Linux. I know that Agent can be run under wine, been there, done that. But with the 1680 x 1050 screen resol

[Pan-users] Pan 0.99999999999999

2011-06-16 Thread Bob Davenport
Will there ever be the possibility of uploading binaries in Pan? As far as I can tell, there is no application that allows binary uploading under Linux. I know that Agent can be run under wine, been there, done that. But with the 1680 x 1050 screen resolution that I use, It is nearly impossible