Re: [Pan-users] pan >= 0.100 fail to compile with gcc 3.2.3 (needs iostream in general/string-view.h)

2006-07-11 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Charles, On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 11:52:01AM -0500, Charles Kerr wrote: > Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > [...] > >Adding #include back to pan/general/string-view.h allows it > >to compile. > > Hi Christian, > > Instead of adding #include to pan/general/string-view.h, > does adding #include t

Re: [Pan-users] pan >= 0.100 fail to compile with gcc 3.2.3 (needs iostream in general/string-view.h)

2006-07-11 Thread Charles Kerr
Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi Charles, *, pan 0.100 and newer fail to compile with gcc 3.2.3 because of the change in pan/general/string-view.h (now includes iosfwd instead of iostream) It fails with: if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I/usr/include/gmime-2.0 -I/opt/gnome2/include/

[Pan-users] pan >= 0.100 fail to compile with gcc 3.2.3 (needs iostream in general/string-view.h)

2006-07-11 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Charles, *, pan 0.100 and newer fail to compile with gcc 3.2.3 because of the change in pan/general/string-view.h (now includes iosfwd instead of iostream) It fails with: if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I/usr/include/gmime-2.0 -I/opt/gnome2/include/glib-2.0 -I/opt/gnome2/lib/g

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.100 bumped from June 11 to June 18. :P

2006-06-13 Thread Garrison Hoffman
Charles Kerr wrote: I took a few extra days on my vacation, and by the time I got back there wasn't enough time to knock off any todo items. Still, I'm back to the grindstone now. :) More than fair. Looking forward to the next release. -gh ___ P

[Pan-users] Pan 0.100 bumped from June 11 to June 18. :P

2006-06-13 Thread Charles Kerr
Garrison Hoffman wrote: Pan 0.100 bumped one week from June 4 to June 11 We type A personalities have trouble coping with things like this. Is Pan late? Did something happen? Should we restructure the calendar days to compensate? I took a few extra days on my vacation, and by the time

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.100

2006-06-12 Thread Garrison Hoffman
David Kelly wrote: The Man said he was taking the family on vacation. Clearly this demonstrates he has his priorities in order. :-) Yes, I saw that, and I'm happy to wait for the next release; however, the source of my burning curiosity/irritating impatience is the subject line of that same

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.100

2006-06-12 Thread David Kelly
On Jun 12, 2006, at 5:30 PM, Garrison Hoffman wrote: I guess I've been spoiled by the weekly releases, but seeing as no one has asked (or the list archive is not updating), will there be a 0.100 release this week? The Man said he was taking the family on vacation. Clearly this demonstrat

[Pan-users] Pan 0.100

2006-06-12 Thread Garrison Hoffman
I have been happily compiling the 0.9x releases on my AMD64 with much success, kudos to the developers of the greatest news reader ever. I guess I've been spoiled by the weekly releases, but seeing as no one has asked (or the list archive is not updating), will there be a 0.100 release this we

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.100 bumped one week from June 4 to June 11

2006-06-01 Thread Steven Ellis
Damn slack I say.. Don't think you are going to be payed for this vacation :) Steve ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.100 bumped one week from June 4 to June 11

2006-06-01 Thread Darren
Enjoy it, you deserve it! Charles Kerr wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm going to take a week's break from Pan to take a family vacation, > so there'll be no new version of Pan this weekend. > > I'll be back to hacking on 0.100 when I get back, so Pan will be > back on track for the following Sunday. >

[Pan-users] Pan 0.100 bumped one week from June 4 to June 11

2006-06-01 Thread Charles Kerr
Hi all, I'm going to take a week's break from Pan to take a family vacation, so there'll be no new version of Pan this weekend. I'll be back to hacking on 0.100 when I get back, so Pan will be back on track for the following Sunday. cheers, Charles