Re: [Pan-users] Newbie compiling Pan v0.133 in Debian stable...

2012-07-02 Thread Duncan
Ant posted on Sun, 01 Jul 2012 12:22:47 -0700 as excerpted: > # apt-get install libcairo2-dev Reading package lists... Done Building > dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could > not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible > situation or if you

Re: [Pan-users] Newbie compiling Pan v0.133 in Debian stable...

2012-07-01 Thread Ant
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > libgtk2.0-dev : Depends: libpango1.0-dev (>= 1.20) but it is not going > > to be installed > > Depends: libcairo2-dev (>= 1.6.4-6.1) but it is not > > going to be installed E: Broken packages > > > Well, I have to admit that

Re: [Pan-users] Newbie compiling Pan v0.133 in Debian stable...

2012-07-01 Thread David Shochat
On Sun, 01 Jul 2012 11:51:48 -0700, Ant wrote: > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > libgtk2.0-dev : Depends: libpango1.0-dev (>= 1.20) but it is not going > to be installed > Depends: libcairo2-dev (>= 1.6.4-6.1) but it is not > going to be installed E: Broken packa

Re: [Pan-users] Newbie compiling Pan v0.133 in Debian stable...

2012-07-01 Thread Ant
> > Hmm, it won't let me install libgtk2.0-dev and its dependencies: > > # apt-get install libgtk2.0-dev libpango1.0-dev libcairo2-dev libcairo2 > > libpixman-1-dev libpixman-1-0 > > I don't understand why you're trying to put the dependencies on the > command line (that's apt-get's job). What h

Re: [Pan-users] Newbie compiling Pan v0.133 in Debian stable...

2012-07-01 Thread David Shochat
On Sun, 01 Jul 2012 11:22:10 -0700, Ant wrote: > Hmm, it won't let me install libgtk2.0-dev and its dependencies: > # apt-get install libgtk2.0-dev libpango1.0-dev libcairo2-dev libcairo2 > libpixman-1-dev libpixman-1-0 I don't understand why you're trying to put the dependencies on the command

Re: [Pan-users] Newbie compiling Pan v0.133 in Debian stable...

2012-07-01 Thread Ant
... > > checking for GLIB - version >= 2.17.6... no *** Could not run GLIB test > > program, checking why... > > *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log > > for the > > *** exact error that occured. This usually means GLIB is incorrectly > > installed. > > > > I sa

Re: [Pan-users] Newbie compiling Pan v0.133 in Debian stable...

2012-07-01 Thread David Shochat
On Sun, 01 Jul 2012 10:30:24 -0700, Ant wrote: > It looks like the ./configure has a bug! I installed intltool package > and got farther, but it now mentions my GLIB: > No, that's just how it works. When it finds something missing that it can't do without, it quits, so it's an iterative process

Re: [Pan-users] Newbie compiling Pan v0.133 in Debian stable...

2012-07-01 Thread Ant
> > line 5219: intltool-update: command not found checking for intltool >= > > 0.40.6... found configure: error: Your intltool is too old. You need > > intltool 0.40.6 or later. > > > > $ apt-cache search intltool intltool-debian - Help i18n of RFC822 > > compliant config files intltool - Utilit

Re: [Pan-users] Newbie compiling Pan v0.133 in Debian stable...

2012-07-01 Thread David Shochat
Also, I'm confused by your subject line. I thought the point was to build 0.136 (or higher) from source (or get it some other way), so as to get the post attachment feature that you wanted in the first place. ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongn

Re: [Pan-users] Newbie compiling Pan v0.133 in Debian stable...

2012-07-01 Thread David Shochat
On Sun, 01 Jul 2012 09:48:35 -0700, Ant wrote: > line 5219: intltool-update: command not found checking for intltool >= > 0.40.6... found configure: error: Your intltool is too old. You need > intltool 0.40.6 or later. > > $ apt-cache search intltool intltool-debian - Help i18n of RFC822 > comp

[Pan-users] Newbie compiling Pan v0.133 in Debian stable...

2012-07-01 Thread Ant
> >> Well, there is at least one other option: You can grab the source and > >> build it yourself. People here can help you with that. > > > > Hmm, source will be a mess and complex. > > Not necessarily. The tools have matured so much over the last 20 years, > most of the complexity is handled a