Am 14.09.2011 06:26, schrieb Ron Johnson:
I think that ./configure doesn't require that the ssl dev files exist.
When I installed libssl-dev (Debian-based distro), then pan built
correctly.
That was an error of mine, please pull and rebuild. Should be fixed.
___
Ron Johnson posted on Wed, 14 Sep 2011 01:11:42 -0500 as excerpted:
> v0.134 built correctly on my machine soon after it was released. That's
> why I presume that something in pan changed.
Interesting. But it could be an system update, too.
> libssl is, in fact the 2nd library found by ldd a
On 09/14/2011 12:52 AM, Duncan wrote:
Ron Johnson posted on Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:26:50 -0500 as excerpted:
[snip]
That suggests a distro-related dependency, likely a library pulled in as
an indirect dependency by some random *.la file, but never actually
linked against by pan.
This is Ubunt
Duncan posted on Wed, 14 Sep 2011 05:52:37 + as excerpted:
> The problem is, pan itself doesn't require the ssl library (-lssl) at
> all to build or link, and indeed, doing a search (case insensitive) in
> my pan build output for ssl comes up entirely empty, no -lssl, no other
> strings with s
Ron Johnson posted on Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:26:50 -0500 as excerpted:
> I think that ./configure doesn't require that the ssl dev files exist.
> When I installed libssl-dev (Debian-based distro), then pan built
> correctly.
>
> Here's what the failed build looked like:
>
> $ git clone git://github
I think that ./configure doesn't require that the ssl dev files exist.
When I installed libssl-dev (Debian-based distro), then pan built correctly.
Here's what the failed build looked like:
$ git clone git://github.com/judgefudge/pan2
$ cd pan2
$ ./autogen.sh
config.status: executing default-1
