Re: [Pan-users] 502 rejected by RADIUS: (no message)

2007-11-16 Thread Kourosh Ghassemieh
;t had any problems. Another plus is that they now support ssl so you don't have to worry about your ISP trying to sniff your news traffic looking for copyright violations or throttling. Hope this helps, Kourosh [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radius_server ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users

Re: [Pan-users] Re: blank Action column

2006-07-27 Thread kourosh
Douglas Bollinger said the following on 07/27/2006 01:37 PM: > On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:19:19 -0700 > kourosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> In my case, I get the stacked platters, but I don't see >> anything to indicate that it's been queued for downl

Re: [Pan-users] Re: blank Action column

2006-07-27 Thread kourosh
o consideration). > > Jeff In my case, I get the stacked platters, but I don't see anything to indicate that it's been queued for download. I sometimes bounce around and sometimes I forget if I've queued something to download or not. Before, the arrow would let me

Re: [Pan-users] blank Action column

2006-07-26 Thread kourosh
come back. Managing binary harvesting without it can be tricky. Regards, Kourosh ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users

[Pan-users] Pan .104 crashes

2006-07-26 Thread kourosh
led. *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (fasttop): 0x08222328 *** Aborted Regards, Kourosh ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users

Re: [Pan-users] 0.104 and VNC

2006-07-25 Thread kourosh
i?bug=376858 > > Looks like there is an upstream patch... > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7294 > > jef > > The temporary workaround is to use a lower pixel depth. I found that 16 works fine with a resolution of 1280x1024. I end up running two sessi

[Pan-users] Issue with files marked for download not being indicated by arrow

2006-07-25 Thread kourosh
is is on Debian unstable using both the pre-packaged .deb on a 32bit system and self compiled on an amd64 64bit system. Thanks, Kourosh ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users

Re: [Pan-users] Consistent seg fault with 0.91

2006-04-05 Thread kourosh
Charles Kerr said the following on 04/05/2006 11:12 AM: Set your CXXFLAGS environmental variable to "-O -ggdb3 -Wall", and re-run configure; make. Then run pan inside of gdb: % gdb pan (gdb) r ..pan runs, and crashes... (gdb) bt Okay, I got a seg fault when switching from a.b.m.a to a.b.m.a

Re: [Pan-users] Consistent seg fault with 0.91

2006-04-05 Thread kourosh
Charles Kerr said the following on 04/05/2006 11:12 AM: kourosh wrote: Hi, My system is currently running Debian unstable for amd64. 0.90 didn't compile for me. 0.92 compiles without problems after I used the fix recommend by Jan De Luyck in the "Building 0.90 on Ubunto Bree

[Pan-users] Consistent seg fault with 0.91

2006-04-05 Thread kourosh
ut I get pretty consistent seg faults. It happens pretty regularly when I open a new group or even when I switch groups. Let me know what other information I can give to debug this. Regards, Kourosh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a Linux kimiko 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp #2 SMP Tue Mar 7 07:22:38 UTC 2