On 8/20/06, jef_e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One other note -- this is definitely something introduced in .109. I
reverted back to .108 with a clean .pan2 directory and things behave
normally. HTH.
jef
Actually I've been getting this since .108 myself, but I've been able
to suppress the crashe
On 8/10/06, Lenny_Nero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lenny_Nero said
>> So you're running the 0.106 executable I built and GTK 2.8.18, and it's
>> not working on Windows 2000, is that correct?
>
> Only .103 is available from the website (unless its changed today) and I
> have always used the GTK 2
On 8/3/06, Brad Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You're not the only one seeing this behaviour. I too, would like per
group sorting back. It's not "urgent" for me, but a "would be nice
if...".
Oh, yeah, it's not "urgent" for me either, really. I can definately
put up with changing the sort
On 8/3/06, Shining Chaos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ugg, I think I had rich formatting on for this post. It was not
intentional, trust me. My apologies.
-Stephen
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/m
Has Pan decided to go with a global header sort order now, instead of
the older method of remembering each group's last sort order? Text
groups I like to sort by date (newest first), and most binary groups
by subject, but by reverse subject or by date with other binary
groups.
Is this not the ca
On 8/2/06, ShiningChaos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd really prefer it to be a switchable preference...-Stephen...okay, boredom made me actually do it. diff -u pan-0.106/pan/gui/prefs-ui.cc pan-0.106-dev/pan/gui/prefs-ui.cc
--- pan-0.106/pan/gui/prefs-ui.cc 2006-07-23 02:25:07.0 -050
On 7/29/06, Robert Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Robert Marshall wrote:I have found LXF42 which does have a half page review of 0.14.0 on page 40,haven't laid my hands on #47 yet - though ISTR pan getting a mention in thereaders rewards one year in LXF. Don't have a scann
