https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698902
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 8:05 PM, walt wrote:
>
>
> On 05/18/2013 12:21 PM, Jim Reiss wrote:
>
> > I ran into something similar recently when I applied the latest packages
> to
> > my Debian Testing system. It jus
I ran into something similar recently when I applied the latest packages to
my Debian Testing system. It just hangs when trying to open the connection.
It appears to already be in the bug tracking system, having to do with SSL
connections. I switched to using non-SSL connecting through stunnel4 a
> I totally agree as well. I was just logging in to search the
> discussions to see if this had come up yet. I prefer the old
> releases' behavior of right-click -> save article attachments, and
> away it went. No dialog or anything.
Ditto. It's one of the main reasons I keep switching back to
> Hi everyone,
>
> pan now seems to dedicate all available connections to
> downloading headers. While this is great when nothing
> else is going on, it does interrupt the downloading of
> binaries. I personally like to start some items
> downloading, and then while that's going on I'll go to
>
> > Personally, I consider the inability to delete servers about the only real
> > showstopper in the betas[2].
> >
> > Charles, what would you prefer?
>
> Not Charles, but IMO it would be /nice/ if both an old and a new version
> could be shipped, since the new version is still missing functiona
> So anyway, you don't get the distinction between old unread and new
> messages that old-pan had, but neither Charles nor myself believe that's a
> big issue. Read/unread is good enough.
Personally I disagree...I think that's true for text newsreading, but
when primarily using pan for binary harv
> > For instance Giganews offers 10 concurrent connections and advertises the
> > fact
> > too. So if I am using 10 connections on a Giganews server I am
> > certainly/definitely not an abusive user.
> >
> > The point is: let me decide, not some program (even if its pan ! :-))
> >
> > So I hum
I see on the developer list that the current beta's limited options are
meant to be complained about, to get a sense of what was used and what
wasn't...at least as far as preferences go. I've just built the 0.91
version and started trying it out, and some initial impressions:
It appears that all
> >> Pan 0.90 is the first beta of a ground-up rewrite of Pan in C++.
>
> > Dude, you rule! Is there an alpha (CVS) version we can beat on?
>
> No, not yet. I'll send mail to pan-users and pan-devel when I land it
> in CVS... I'm not sure that it wouldn't make more sense to have a new
> pack
> Is it possible to put up a dialog box to say that you've run out of
> memory (or about to run out)? It's not very user-friendly to just die with
> no explanation.
True, it's not particularly friendly, but it's pretty common in the UNIX/Linux
world in the case of memory being exhausted. It would
> 1. I have about 12 news groups subscribed. I try to download all of the
> headers for these, but after 30 minutes or so I go back to the computer
> and pan is
> no longer running and I need to start over. Why?
A likely cause is running out of memory. Unless you're using the
unreleased version
11 matches
Mail list logo
