Re: [Pan-users] no longer get message bodies

2024-03-08 Thread Duncan
dchmelik-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w posted on Fri, 8 Mar 2024 19:44:16 -0800 as excerpted: > Lately I could no longer get message headers (on > news.eternal-september.org (ES) nor news.gmane.io) (and preferences.xml > maybe got corrupted again (seems to happen regularly) this time in my ES > password)

Re: [Pan-users] article cache size

2024-03-08 Thread Duncan
David Chmelik posted on Fri, 8 Mar 2024 18:24:47 -0800 as excerpted: > On 3/8/24 5:49 PM, Duncan wrote: >> David Chmelik posted on Fri, 8 Mar 2024 05:19:17 - (UTC) as >> excerpted: >> >>> What [cache] size do you recommend if I currently use 1,500+ >>> newsgroups, and some are binary but dead,

[Pan-users] no longer get message bodies

2024-03-08 Thread dchmelik
Lately I could no longer get message headers (on news.eternal-september.org (ES) nor news.gmane.io) (and preferences.xml maybe got corrupted again (seems to happen regularly) this time in my ES password) but could after I restart, but still can't get message bodies even if I select 'read this a

Re: [Pan-users] interface bug

2024-03-08 Thread Duncan
Jim Henderson posted on Fri, 8 Mar 2024 06:51:23 - (UTC) as excerpted: > On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 21:09:37 -0800, dchmelik-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w > wrote: > >> Earlier today I was reading usenet & gmane but suddenly when I went to >> gmane.org.unix-heritage.general and selected an article to read,

Re: [Pan-users] article cache size

2024-03-08 Thread David Chmelik
On 3/8/24 5:49 PM, Duncan wrote: David Chmelik posted on Fri, 8 Mar 2024 05:19:17 - (UTC) as excerpted: On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 21:10:56 + (UTC), Duncan wrote: As to your question, years ago I was the person who asked to bump the max cache size from 1 GiB -- I needed 4 GiB at the time and

Re: [Pan-users] article cache size

2024-03-08 Thread Duncan
David Chmelik posted on Fri, 8 Mar 2024 05:19:17 - (UTC) as excerpted: > On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 21:10:56 + (UTC), Duncan wrote: >> As to your question, years ago I was the person who asked to bump the >> max cache size from 1 GiB -- I needed 4 GiB at the time and it was >> bumped to 20, which