Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.144 for Windows

2018-04-09 Thread Petr Kovar
On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 17:06:44 +0100 Steve Davies wrote: > On 9 April 2018 at 16:50, Martin > wrote: > > > Hi > > > > Am Dienstag, 3. April 2018 um 23:01 schrieben Sie: > > > > > Check now :) > > > > > On 26 February 2018 at 17:03, Steve Davies > > > wrote: > > > > > Not yet I'm afraid. I have

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.144 for Windows

2018-04-09 Thread Steve Davies
Yes, it is the external libraries and toolchain that you need to link against - most of them need to be specially installed alongside their 64-bit counterparts. PAN has a lot of external dependencies :) This is why I would (personally) install a separate Mingw32 environment so there can be no acci

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.144 for Windows

2018-04-09 Thread Zan Lynx
On 04/09/2018 10:17 AM, Zan Lynx wrote: > For GCC based compilers like Mingw, can't you just add the -m32 > command-line option in order to build a 32-bit image? Ah so it is a little more complicated than I thought. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19690504/how-do-i-compile-and-link-a-32-bit-w

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.144 for Windows

2018-04-09 Thread Zan Lynx
On 04/09/2018 10:06 AM, Steve Davies wrote: > On 9 April 2018 at 16:50, Martin wrote: > Again my queston: Is there no 32-bit Windows version 0.144. I can't > run 64-bit version on my laptop. > > > Hi Martin, > > Sadly I no longer have a 32-bit operating system to build this on. I > used

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.144 for Windows

2018-04-09 Thread Martin
Hi Am Montag, 9. April 2018 um 18:06 schrieben Sie: >> Again my queston: Is there no 32-bit Windows version 0.144. I can't >> run 64-bit version on my laptop. > Sadly I no longer have a 32-bit operating system to build this on. > I used to do this on a virtual-machine environment, but no longer

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.144 for Windows

2018-04-09 Thread Steve Davies
On 9 April 2018 at 16:50, Martin wrote: > Hi > > Am Dienstag, 3. April 2018 um 23:01 schrieben Sie: > > > Check now :) > > > On 26 February 2018 at 17:03, Steve Davies wrote: > > > Not yet I'm afraid. I have made a note to update to it. The windows > > installer version is only a very small dist