On Sat, 23 May 2015 13:47:59 -0700, walt wrote:
> On 05/21/2015 05:51 AM, Maurice wrote:
>> Last week I was in a French (Aix-en-Provence) hotel whose WiFi access
>> was blocking Port 119, so could not use Pan to access newsgroups.
>>
>> Is there an alternative port I could have used, or any other
On 05/23/2015 02:08 PM, David Shochat wrote:
(replying off-list) Got to this page.
I always find it amusing when somebody sends an off-list response to the
list itself.
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailm
On 05/23/2015 01:47 PM, walt wrote:
I've never actually tried this method, (never needed to) but I think you
could use a tool like ssh in "port forwarding" mode, depending on the news
server, maybe.
I was thinking that if you can read news on your home machine, and you
have a reliable way to g
(replying off-list) Got to this page.
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
The unsubscribe instructions are at the bottom of the page. If someone else
has already responded, I apologize for the duplication.
-- David
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Dieter Britz
wrote:
> Can I st
Can I stop receiving all these emails? How?
--
Regards
Dieter
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
On 05/21/2015 05:51 AM, Maurice wrote:
> Last week I was in a French (Aix-en-Provence) hotel whose WiFi access
> was blocking Port 119, so could not use Pan to access newsgroups.
>
> Is there an alternative port I could have used, or any other workaround?
I've never actually tried this method, (
On Sat, 23 May 2015 11:15:21 +, Maurice wrote:
> What puzzles me is why it wasn't, but that's a different question:
> Is it a good thing for some versions to be compiled with and others
> not?!
It's up to each distribution to decide what level of risk they're willing
to assume when it come
On Sat, 23 May 2015 11:15:21 +, Maurice wrote:
> On Fri, 22 May 2015 17:26:00 +, David Shochat wrote:
>
>> think you missed a key part of what Duncan posted:
>
> I didn't, actually.
> It's just that as a Mageia user I use the Mageia version, which
> Duncan's response confirms was not
On Fri, 22 May 2015 17:26:00 +, David Shochat wrote:
> think you missed a key part of what Duncan posted:
I didn't, actually.
It's just that as a Mageia user I use the Mageia version, which
Duncan's response confirms was not built with the security options.
What puzzles me is why it wasn
