-Original Message-
From: walt
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 2:43 PM
To: pan-users@nongnu.org
Subject: [Pan-users] Saving incomplete binary articles?
I'm not sure, but I think pan has changed its attitude recently about
saving binary articles to disk.. (BTW, I'm always running the la
Joe Zeff posted on Sat, 02 Mar 2013 14:54:29 -0800 as excerpted:
> Recently I upgraded from Fedora 16 to 17. When I tried to use Pan, I
> had a few issues. I've filed a bug report
> ( https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695022 ) but I'm also
> mentioning it here so that people who don't f
walt posted on Sat, 02 Mar 2013 14:43:21 -0800 as excerpted:
> I'm not sure, but I think pan has changed its attitude recently about
> saving binary articles to disk.. (BTW, I'm always running the latest pan
> from git.)
>
> Today, for example, I was downloading a binary post with about 15 parts,
On 03/02/2013 04:58 PM, walt wrote:
Hi Joe, I posted a reply to your gnome.org bug report FWIW.
Yes. I've seen both of them and replied. Again, thanx for getting back
to me so quickly.
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
https://lists
On 03/02/2013 02:54 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> Recently I upgraded from Fedora 16 to 17. When I tried to use Pan, I
> had a few issues. I've filed a bug report
> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695022) but I'm also
> mentioning it here so that people who don't follow that site can be
> k
Recently I upgraded from Fedora 16 to 17. When I tried to use Pan, I
had a few issues. I've filed a bug report
(https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695022) but I'm also
mentioning it here so that people who don't follow that site can be kept
informed.
I'm not sure, but I think pan has changed its attitude recently about
saving binary articles to disk.. (BTW, I'm always running the latest pan
from git.)
Today, for example, I was downloading a binary post with about 15 parts,
and after half an hour I noticed that two of those parts were still not
