Re: [Pan-users] attachments in Pan to Usenet

2013-01-30 Thread Duncan
Heinrich Müller posted on Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:11:12 +0100 as excerpted: > Am 30.01.2013 17:38, schrieb Cipher Cipher: >> At: http://pan.rebelbase.com/features/ >> >> I read: >> >> /It's good for Uploading Content to Usenet. >> Files can be attached to a Usenet article and are automatically >> yEnc

Re: [Pan-users] Bad authentication segfaults pan

2013-01-30 Thread Rhialto
On Wed 30 Jan 2013 at 16:36:20 +, Duncan wrote: > (Meanwhile, fixing that static mutex thing would be nice, too. I'm > dumbly patching out the static for now, but I guess that's the wrong > patch from what I've read right here, and I was actually wondering if > something with that might hav

Re: [Pan-users] attachments in Pan to Usenet

2013-01-30 Thread Heinrich Müller
Am 30.01.2013 17:38, schrieb Cipher Cipher: At: http://pan.rebelbase.com/features/ I read: /It's good for Uploading Content to Usenet. Files can be attached to a Usenet article and are automatically yEnc-encrypted, threaded and referenced by Pan./ Yet I don't see any mention of how to do thi

Re: [Pan-users] Bad authentication segfaults pan

2013-01-30 Thread Heinrich Müller
Am 30.01.2013 17:36, schrieb Duncan: So I finally did that $50 1TB block thing from Astraweb I've been talking about on and off. The problem is that they had MUCH stricter password settings (limited to 12 alphanumeric chars, despite a FAQ entry saying be sure it's not easily guessed, thus stimul

[Pan-users] attachments in Pan to Usenet

2013-01-30 Thread Cipher Cipher
At: http://pan.rebelbase.com/features/ I read: *It's good for Uploading Content to Usenet. Files can be attached to a Usenet article and are automatically yEnc-encrypted, threaded and referenced by Pan.* Yet I don't see any mention of how to do this in the manual, and in Pan, I do not see any me

[Pan-users] Bad authentication segfaults pan

2013-01-30 Thread Duncan
So I finally did that $50 1TB block thing from Astraweb I've been talking about on and off. The problem is that they had MUCH stricter password settings (limited to 12 alphanumeric chars, despite a FAQ entry saying be sure it's not easily guessed, thus stimulating an original password of somet