On 01/21/2013 03:58 PM, Chris Gentle wrote:
> I finally got around to testing the latest compressed headers fixes
> and it seems to work with Supernews. It connects and retrieves
> headers anyway. Not sure how to verify that the headers are actually
> compressed. Maybe some visual feedback in
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 01:05:59 +, Duncan wrote:
> But good you found it. Now to see if the sig behavior you're wondering
> about in the other thread is due to its new options, too. =:^)
Seems that's the case. Thanks for the help, Duncan - you've been around
here a long time, and demonstrate
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:59:51 +, Duncan wrote:
> 1) View menu, body pane, show article signature (shortcut of "i").
That did it. I must spend more time going through the new menus, it
seems. :)
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:59:51 +, Duncan wrote:
>
> 1) View menu, body pane, show article signature (shortcut of "i").
>
Yes. When I tried that the sig reappeared.
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/list
Jim Henderson posted on Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:29:25 + as excerpted:
> AH! In looking to enable this, I went to the wrong tab, and there's an
> option to expand on selection, and enabling that fixed it. :)
Same tab (behavior), at least in live-git, but different section (groups
vs. articles),
David Shochat posted on Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:41:11 + as excerpted:
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:31:18 +, Jim Henderson wrote:
>
>> I've just noticed that 0.139 also seems to suppress signature blocks
>> (or partially suppresses them).
>>
> I can confirm that I see your sig when I read via E-m
I finally got around to testing the latest compressed headers fixes and it
seems to work with Supernews. It connects and retrieves headers anyway.
Not sure how to verify that the headers are actually compressed. Maybe
some visual feedback in the task manager that the headers are being
compressed?
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:31:18 +, Jim Henderson wrote:
> I've just noticed that 0.139 also seems to suppress signature blocks (or
> partially suppresses them).
>
I can confirm that I see your sig when I read via E-mail but it is
missing when I read your post in pan (0.139).
_
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:31:18 +, Jim Henderson wrote:
> I've just noticed that 0.139 also seems to suppress signature blocks (or
> partially suppresses them).
>
> I noticed that the openSUSE forums' newsgroups (which I am an admin for
> and maintain the NNTP gateway from vBulletin for) started
I've just noticed that 0.139 also seems to suppress signature blocks (or
partially suppresses them).
I noticed that the openSUSE forums' newsgroups (which I am an admin for
and maintain the NNTP gateway from vBulletin for) started dropping
signature blocks recently - so checked with a perl tool
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:43:29 +, Duncan wrote:
> Hmm... that last described behavior, collapsing all threads except the
> selected, with the selected post remaining selected thru an unthreading/
> rethreading goggle, is /exactly/ the behavior I see here.
>
> Maybe it's a gtk issue, not a pan i
Jim Henderson posted on Mon, 21 Jan 2013 07:01:26 + as excerpted:
> I also cloned the git source (which did build, just without gtkspell for
> some reason) and confirmed that behaviour is the same in that build as
> well (selection stays when going threaded->unthreaded, but not from
> unthread
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 01:33:21 +, Duncan wrote:
> FWIW, it seems to work correctly here on pan-git (pre-0.140, see my
> headers for the git commit ID).
>
> 0.136 is outdated, April 8, 2012. The current release is 0.139, from
> June 30, 2012. The changelog includes this for 0.138:
>
> * Keep
13 matches
Mail list logo
