Mike Brown posted on Sat, 25 Aug 2012 09:46:41 -0500 as excerpted:
> The /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gmime-2.6.pc file does not exist, but the
> /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/gmime-2.6.pc file does exist.
>
> I'm running a 64 bit system. The directory /usr/lib/pkgconfig does not
> exist.
>
> Plus, configure is l
Rhialto posted on Sat, 25 Aug 2012 15:26:33 +0200 as excerpted:
> Not that there is nothing wrong with pkgconfig. My favourite peeve for
> instance is that often, if a shared library uses some other shared
> library, that dependency is made explicit even when it need not be. That
> results in unne
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 02:25:21PM +, David Shochat wrote:
> Are you sure you have the gmime-devel rpm installed? I looked at a list
> for Fedora 14 and the rpm did seem to include /usr/lib/pkgconfig/
> gmime-2.6.pc.
The /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gmime-2.6.pc file does not exist, but the
/usr/lib64
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 09:00:01 -0500, Mike Brown wrote:
> The config files tha pkg-config are looking for are in the expected
> location, but not all RPM packages update/create the file that
> pkg-config is looking for. In the case of pan, the info for GMIME
> doesn't exist, even though GMIME is in
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 03:26:33PM +0200, Rhialto wrote:
> I think that the vast majority of software that uses configure scripts
> also uses pkgconfig, these days.
IMHO, I think that the use of pkg-config is unfortunate.
> As I understand it, pkgconfig is used to determine *where* something is
On Sat 25 Aug 2012 at 04:30:46 -0500, Mike Brown wrote:
> I have to upgrade from Fedora 14 in order to get a newer pan. Can't do source
> as the developers have decided that a program should be used to determine if
> what is needed is installed (pkg-config). But, because not ALL of the needed
I
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 08:50:37AM +, Duncan wrote:
> 1) It's really cool that, of all the apps you could choose to use for
> that sort of news download volume, you choose to use pan. There was a
> time when it would have had a very hard time scaling, and it's great that
> it not only can d
Mike Brown posted on Sat, 25 Aug 2012 02:23:24 -0500 as excerpted:
> Let's see. Astra has the $20 for 3 months, unlimited download. 1TB is
> about 300 binary files in the 3GB range. I download some less and some
> more, as far as size. I'll easily download more than 300 files in 3
> months. E
Mike Brown posted on Sat, 25 Aug 2012 02:23:24 -0500 as excerpted:
> 1TB is about 300 binary files in the 3GB range. I download some less
> and some more, as far as size.
Yeah, if you're doing multi-gig files daily, block accounts aren't the
best choice.
But for mostly text users they can't be
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 06:34:48AM +, Duncan wrote:
> While blocknews has HISTORICALLY been cheaper, Astra's current $50 1000
> GB plan seriously undercuts blocknews ATM (that's roughly their 500 gig
> plan price, 1024=$91, 3072=$240). So Astra's WAAAYYY ahead, price-wise,
> ATM.
Let's see
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:07:29AM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 08/24/2012 11:34 PM, Duncan wrote:
>> But, I've done a bit of research as I keep thinking I'll start with a
>> paid service again at some point and I thought I'd pass this on in case
>> you weren't aware of it...
>
> I've been very happ
On 08/24/2012 11:34 PM, Duncan wrote:
But, I've done a bit of research as I keep thinking I'll start with a
paid service again at some point and I thought I'd pass this on in case
you weren't aware of it...
I've been very happy, TYVM, with usenetmonster.com for the last several
years. $2.95/m
12 matches
Mail list logo
