Re: [Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up

2012-06-19 Thread Duncan
Steve Davies posted on Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:21:26 +0100 as excerpted: > I object to the wasted line. What I do is the style from the first > C-programming book I ever read. It just stuck. Heh, what I do is the style from most shell script functions I've seen, without the wasted line. =:^) The fi

Re: [Pan-users] FWIW: A new version of Pan .0138 with gnutls and GTK3 is on the PPA as of 1 hour or so ago

2012-06-19 Thread Bob
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:40:54 +, Bob wrote: > Note: This is for Ub Precise. The rest of the builds do not seem to > have TLS > > Got it downloaded and installed. Server prefs. show TLS available and > am posting this with same. > > Does not seem to have the color corrections mentioned earl

Re: [Pan-users] FWIW: A new version of Pan .0138 with gnutls and GTK3 is on the PPA as of 1 hour or so ago

2012-06-19 Thread Duncan
Bob posted on Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:40:54 + as excerpted: > Note: This is for Ub Precise. The rest of the builds do not seem to > have TLS > > Got it downloaded and installed. Server prefs. show TLS available and > am posting this with same. > > Does not seem to have the color corrections m

[Pan-users] FWIW: A new version of Pan .0138 with gnutls and GTK3 is on the PPA as of 1 hour or so ago

2012-06-19 Thread Bob
Note: This is for Ub Precise. The rest of the builds do not seem to have TLS Got it downloaded and installed. Server prefs. show TLS available and am posting this with same. Does not seem to have the color corrections mentioned earlier. Although I will investigate. bob ___

Re: [Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up

2012-06-19 Thread Steve Davies
On 19 June 2012 01:30, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Travis posted on Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:35:38 -0700 as excerpted: > >> Steve Davies posted: >>> In the meantime, I am attaching a patch which improves things a lot for >>> me... > >> How do we not techie/coder types use this patch? > > I'm

Re: [Pan-users] Win32 build of 0.138 up

2012-06-19 Thread Steve Davies
On 19 June 2012 00:23, walt wrote: > On 06/18/2012 10:24 AM, Steve Davies wrote: [pseudo code redacted to avoid conflict] > > I fixed your lousy c formatting style for you ;) > > I think maybe our preferences between the two different styles > are hardwired into our brains or something.  Reminds

Re: [Pan-users] Anyone know why pan occasionaly decides it needs to download all headers in a group?

2012-06-19 Thread Jim Henderson
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 07:16:05 +, Duncan wrote: > What would make pan try to redownload all headers, instead of just the > ones since it last downloaded? > > Somehow, that tracking is getting out of sync. That makes sense. > The most common way it gets out of sync is if you transfer servers a

Re: [Pan-users] Anyone know why pan occasionaly decides it needs to download all headers in a group?

2012-06-19 Thread Duncan
Jim Henderson posted on Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:32:44 + as excerpted: > I've got a handful of servers I subscribe to groups from. About once > every day or two, with random groups (which one varies, and all of them > have been hit from one time to another), Pan will decide that instead of > using