Re: [Pan-users] Bye bye pan 0.14, what's next for pan 0.1xx?

2012-05-09 Thread Maurice Batey
On Wed, 09 May 2012 17:33:19 +0100, I wrote: > I'll just stay with 32-bit a while longer Panic over! I've discovered that if I 'enable' the 32-bit sources of the 64-bit Mageia, then its software installer can automatically pull in the 32-bit lib's that old-Pan needs. (This posting sent from 64

Re: [Pan-users] Bye bye pan 0.14, what's next for pan 0.1xx?

2012-05-09 Thread Maurice Batey
On Wed, 09 May 2012 11:46:36 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NZB Thank yuu, Ron! -- /\/\aurice ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users

Re: [Pan-users] Bye bye pan 0.14, what's next for pan 0.1xx?

2012-05-09 Thread Maurice Batey
On Wed, 09 May 2012 13:07:04 -0400, George Czerw wrote: > I just copied over the article-cache, > article-drafts and groups directories into .pan2 Ah, so one can 'import' some of the old-Pan data. Thanks, Ggeorge! -- /\/\aurice ___ Pa

Re: [Pan-users] Bye bye pan 0.14, what's next for pan 0.1xx?

2012-05-09 Thread Duncan
George Czerw posted on Wed, 09 May 2012 13:07:04 -0400 as excerpted: > On Wednesday, May 09, 2012 11:30:20 am Maurice Batey wrote: >> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:09:30 +0100, I wrote: >> > No doubt the day will come when I shall have to make the change... >> >> Having installed the 64-bit Mageia-2 Bet

Re: [Pan-users] Small portability issue

2012-05-09 Thread Duncan
Rhialto posted on Wed, 09 May 2012 18:25:06 +0200 as excerpted: > CXXmime-utils.o > mime-utils.cc: In function 'char* pan::__g_mime_iconv_strndup > (__tag_iconv_t*, const char*, size_t, const char*)': > mime-utils.cc:80: error: invalid conversion from 'char**' > to 'const char**'

Re: [Pan-users] Small portability issue

2012-05-09 Thread Heinrich Mueller
Am 09.05.2012 13:48, schrieb Rhialto: I'm updating the pkgsrc entry for Pan, and while doing that, it points me to a portability issue in the configure script: => Checking for portability problems in extracted files WARNING: [check-portability.awk] => Found $RANDOM: WARNING: [check-portability

Re: [Pan-users] Bye bye pan 0.14, what's next for pan 0.1xx?

2012-05-09 Thread George Czerw
On Wednesday, May 09, 2012 11:30:20 am Maurice Batey wrote: > On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:09:30 +0100, I wrote: > > No doubt the day will come when I shall have to make the change... > > Having installed the 64-bit Mageia-2 Beta3, I find that 'old' Pan will > not install (though no problem with the 32-

Re: [Pan-users] Bye bye pan 0.14, what's next for pan 0.1xx?

2012-05-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On 05/09/2012 11:33 AM, Maurice Batey wrote: On Wed, 09 May 2012 16:11:29 +, Jim Henderson wrote: The new version of Pan is a complete rewrite, and doesn't use the old rules engine or config. Oh, brilliant! Ah well, I'll just stay with 32-bit a while longer then. But what are the 'N

Re: [Pan-users] Bye bye pan 0.14, what's next for pan 0.1xx?

2012-05-09 Thread Maurice Batey
On Wed, 09 May 2012 16:11:29 +, Jim Henderson wrote: > The new version of Pan is a complete rewrite, and doesn't use the > old rules engine or config. Oh, brilliant! Ah well, I'll just stay with 32-bit a while longer then. But what are the 'NZB' files that Pan2 mentions (in File/Import)

Re: [Pan-users] Small portability issue

2012-05-09 Thread Rhialto
Another thing I encountered: Making all in usenet-utils gmake[3]: Entering directory `/home/rhialto/tmp/news/pan/work.x86_64/pan-0.137/pan/usenet-utils' CXXfilter-info.o CXXrules-info.o CXXgnksa.o CXXmessage-check.o CXXmime-utils.o mime-utils.cc: In function 'char* p

Re: [Pan-users] Bye bye pan 0.14, what's next for pan 0.1xx?

2012-05-09 Thread Jim Henderson
On Wed, 09 May 2012 16:30:20 +0100, Maurice Batey wrote: > Do I really have to ditch the .pan setup and start all over from > scratch? Yes. The new version of Pan is a complete rewrite, and doesn't use the old rules engine or config. Jim -- Jim Henderson Please keep on-topic replies on the

Re: [Pan-users] Bye bye pan 0.14, what's next for pan 0.1xx?

2012-05-09 Thread Maurice Batey
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:09:30 +0100, I wrote: > No doubt the day will come when I shall have to make the change... Having installed the 64-bit Mageia-2 Beta3, I find that 'old' Pan will not install (though no problem with the 32-bit Mageia). Seems old Pan depends on 32-bit lib's that 64-bit Magei

Re: [Pan-users] Small portability issue

2012-05-09 Thread Rhialto
On Wed 09 May 2012 at 13:16:32 +, Duncan wrote: > So no big deal there. It falls back as it should, and obviously if > someone's building from git, they should have git available to report it > so... Ok, that's fine. I'm currently building with various combinations of configure options, and

Re: [Pan-users] Small portability issue

2012-05-09 Thread Duncan
Rhialto posted on Wed, 09 May 2012 13:48:36 +0200 as excerpted: > Also, "git: not found" seems to indicate that "git" is used in > configure? All that is, is the detection "magic" for the git commit info as found in pan's about box and user-agent string, when it's built from git. (See my heade

Re: [Pan-users] SSL on Pan 137

2012-05-09 Thread Bob
On Tue, 08 May 2012 15:39:39 +0200, Heinrich Mueller wrote: > Am 08.05.2012 15:22, schrieb Ed Fletcher: >> On 2012-05-08, at 2:15 AM, Heinrich Müller wrote: >> >>> Am 08.05.2012 03:19, schrieb Ed Fletcher: Hi: I'm running Pan 0.137 on Linux Mint 201204. I've got everything wo

[Pan-users] Small portability issue

2012-05-09 Thread Rhialto
I'm updating the pkgsrc entry for Pan, and while doing that, it points me to a portability issue in the configure script: => Checking for portability problems in extracted files WARNING: [check-portability.awk] => Found $RANDOM: WARNING: [check-portability.awk] configure: INTLTOOL_XML_NOMER