On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 00:43:29 +, Duncan wrote:
>> Another direction is to just keep the socket to Leafnode open, and then
>> if it gets closed inadvertently, just open a new connection. Does that
>> seem at all reasonable? I would prefer to deal with individual
>> messages only at the level o
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 08:05:50 +, Duncan wrote:
> Joe Zeff posted on Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:03:24 -0700 as excerpted:
>
>> On 04/02/2012 11:46 AM, Duncan wrote:
>>> On gentoo I build from sources, but I've not had dependency hell since
>>> my Mandrake days, as there's usually at least a masked ver
SciFi posted on Thu, 05 Apr 2012 09:40:34 + as excerpted:
> Also, I don't like to continually run a tcpdump or wireshark task as
> Duncan suggests -- I would need to keep it going "for all hours"
> and "for all ports" that GN might be connected with Pan.
> There wouldn't be much synchronizatio
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 17:17:02 +, Heinrich Müller wrote:
>
> SciFi posted on Wed, 04 Apr 2012 14:10:34 +:
> […]
>>
>> The glitch with Giganews, tho, is still bothering us, as I've asked HM
>> for some help privately. Namely, I'd like to see the "hexdump -C" of
>> the actual network packet(
