On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:41:36 +, Duncan wrote:
> Another option that would fit in nicely with the first would be to add an
> open in browser option. The existing browser setting that's activated
> when a URL is clicked would be opened to display the html part in the
> tool already designed
Rhialto posted on Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:22:08 +0100 as excerpted:
> On Fri 10 Feb 2012 at 03:41:36 +, Duncan wrote:
>> the tool already designed to handle html in a secure and efficient way,
>> the browser.
>
> I know about "the browser", but what is this "tool already designed to
> handle html
Steven D'Aprano posted on Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:33:08 +1100 as excerpted:
> Duncan wrote:
>> Rui Maciel posted on Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:07:01 + as excerpted:
>>
>>> On 02/09/2012 12:34 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I really don't understand the choice of displaying HTML attachments
in-line
On Fri 10 Feb 2012 at 03:41:36 +, Duncan wrote:
> the tool already designed to handle html in a secure and efficient
> way, the browser.
I know about "the browser", but what is this "tool already designed to
handle html in a secure and efficient way"?
:^)
-Olaf.
--
___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert
