Ron Johnson posted on Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:19:51 -0500 as excerpted:
> On 10/10/2011 04:55 AM, Duncan wrote:
>> Ron Johnson posted on Sun, 09 Oct 2011 22:15:24 -0500 as excerpted:
>>
> [snip]
>>
>> The biggest problem is pan's assumption that it has all the information
>> necessary to maintain its
On 10/10/2011 10:41 PM, Duncan wrote:
Ron Johnson posted on Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:00:56 -0500 as excerpted:
On 10/10/2011 04:55 AM, Duncan wrote:
Ron Johnson posted on Sun, 09 Oct 2011 22:15:24 -0500 as excerpted:
It's a fact that 32-bit Pan runs out of *process* address space at
around 2GB.
Ron Johnson posted on Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:00:56 -0500 as excerpted:
> On 10/10/2011 04:55 AM, Duncan wrote:
>> Ron Johnson posted on Sun, 09 Oct 2011 22:15:24 -0500 as excerpted:
>>
>>> It's a fact that 32-bit Pan runs out of *process* address space at
>>> around 2GB. 64-bit Pan doesn't technical
On 10/10/2011 04:55 AM, Duncan wrote:
Ron Johnson posted on Sun, 09 Oct 2011 22:15:24 -0500 as excerpted:
[snip]
The biggest problem is pan's assumption that it has all the information
necessary to maintain its threading structure in memory at all times. In
ordered to really allow pan to bec
On 10/10/2011 04:55 AM, Duncan wrote:
Ron Johnson posted on Sun, 09 Oct 2011 22:15:24 -0500 as excerpted:
On 10/09/2011 09:58 PM, Lacrocivious Acrophosist wrote:
Ron Johnson writes:
[64-bit pan]
One of the first things that I did was try out Pan on a binary group.
Many hours later, it ha
Ron Johnson posted on Sun, 09 Oct 2011 22:15:24 -0500 as excerpted:
> On 10/09/2011 09:58 PM, Lacrocivious Acrophosist wrote:
>> Ron Johnson writes:
>>
>>> [64-bit pan]
>>>
>>> One of the first things that I did was try out Pan on a binary group.
>>>
>>> Many hours later, it had fetched 6 weeks o
Am Mon, 10 Oct 2011 01:46:20 -0500 schrieb Ron Johnson:
> On 10/10/2011 01:05 AM, Heinrich Mueller wrote:
>> Am 10.10.2011 05:15, schrieb Ron Johnson:
>>> On 10/09/2011 09:58 PM, Lacrocivious Acrophosist wrote:
Ron Johnson writes:
> Having to upgrade to Ubuntu Maverick because N
