Steven D'Aprano posted on Sat, 09 Jul 2011 10:19:36 +1000 as excerpted:
> Beartooth wrote:
>
>> But I do claim the blind hen's occasional grain of corn : we need
>> to optimize against the likely abuses of the twenty-teens, whatever we
>> can guess of those.
>
> I don't know what this means
Beartooth wrote:
What will the effect be on how Pan works, who adopts or emulates
it, or whatever? (If Pan Triumphant will emulate the horseshoe nail by
making the whole Evil Empire of Redmond fall into a cybernetic abyss,
Excelsior! say I.)
I'm kinda tired of Microsoft bashing, and I'm sa
Beartooth wrote:
But I do claim the blind hen's occasional grain of corn : we need
to optimize against the likely abuses of the twenty-teens, whatever we
can guess of those.
I don't know what this means.
Hesitant, second-hand example : I've encountered intelligent
posters on a wide varie
On 07/08/2011 12:03 AM, Duncan wrote:
Obviously, my take as stated above was rather different. The way I read
it, he was no longer the least bit interested in being involved, while
you obviously believe he'd be willing to do an update, at least.
Somewhere in the middle is another way.
I made
Beartooth posted on Mon, 04 Jul 2011 21:06:07 + as excerpted:
> It's another tack on the question of theory and practice, applied
> this time to the GNKSA itself. Given that GNKSA is a great idea, to
> which we all wish well; and given also the observations in this thread
> about its currency;
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:15:52 +, walt wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 13:44:19 +, Heinrich Mueller wrote:
>
>> For those that know how to : Please test my code for bugs in the
>> following modules if you have the time:
>> - Upload functionality - Log functionality (right click on multipart
>>
Joe Zeff posted on Mon, 04 Jul 2011 13:43:13 -0700 as excerpted:
> I've just received a response to my email about updating the GNKSA. In
> part, it says:
>
> Actually, I consider the GNKSA a historic document, to be read in the
> context of its own time, rather than a useful guideline for today
