Beartooth posted on Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:12:50 + as excerpted:
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:08:29 -0600, K. Haley wrote:
>
>> On 06/27/2011 12:55 PM, Duncan wrote:
>>> If I'm not mistaken,
>>>
>> Actually gmime-2.5 has been around for a while, it just hasn't been
>> released as a stable version y
On 06/28/2011 02:35 PM, walt wrote:
I've not tried gnome 3 yet -- gentoo is moving slowly towards it,
not rushing. What interpreted language do you refer to?
I gather that there's a fair amount of Java used and that the
third-party extensions are mostly (if not totally) in that language. I
On 06/28/2011 10:20 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> ... And, I don't like the idea of a DE [gnome] that depends so
> much on interpreted languages; no matter how fast your box is,
> there's got to be a performance hit and it adds up.
I've not tried gnome 3 yet -- gentoo is moving slowly towards it,
not rus
On 06/28/2011 07:05 AM, Beartooth wrote:
(Fwiw, I'll be one of those skipping F15 till Gnome 3 has changed
a bunch, or else running Xfce or even KDE 4 on it. After several days'
look, I see more new tricks than are worth this old dog's while to learn,
alas!)
I've gone to XFCE and am very happy
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:08:29 -0600, K. Haley wrote:
> On 06/27/2011 12:55 PM, Duncan wrote:
>> If I'm not mistaken, pan-0.134 didn't yet support gnome3, but there's
>> definitely support for gnome3 in khaley's git repo, and I believe it
>> made it into 0.135 as well.
>>
>> Further, even if I'm wro
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:55:41 +, Duncan wrote:
> Beartooth posted on Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:22:48 + as excerpted:
>
>> I'm running Scientific Linux 6 on one machine, and getting this :
>>
>> package gmime-2.5.3-1.el6.rf.i686 (which is newer than
>> gmime-2.4.7-1.99.el6.i686) is already
Heinrich Mueller posted on Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:36:32 +0200 as excerpted:
> On 06/28/11 11:17, Duncan wrote:
>> Could the text appear as another post, beside the others? That's what
>> I expected.
> Perhaps, but I have to figure out what the subject/text would be then.
If it's a reply (as discu
On 06/28/11 11:17, Duncan wrote:
Heinrich Mueller posted on Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:21:41 +0200 as excerpted:
Normally attachments are yEnc-encoded with uuencode, then sent. The
message text is discarded for now, as it would be the same message for
possibly 100s of files anyway.
OK, that answers a
Heinrich Mueller posted on Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:21:41 +0200 as excerpted:
> Normally attachments are yEnc-encoded with uuencode, then sent. The
> message text is discarded for now, as it would be the same message for
> possibly 100s of files anyway.
OK, that answers another problem/question I had,
On 06/28/11 02:28, Duncan wrote:
walt posted on Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:40:23 + as excerpted:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:13:48 +, walt wrote:
I haven't read enough code to know where the encoding cache is.
Well, duh. I just spotted the brand-new 'encode-cache' directory in
~/.pan2, so I don
On 06/28/11 00:53, K. Haley wrote:
On 06/19/2011 01:15 PM, Heinrich Mueller wrote:
BTW, I implemented a rough version of SSL support in my experimental
branch. It seems to work OK, but I have to test
it thoroughly.
FYI, a proper solution will have to support the official STARTTLS method
of secu
11 matches
Mail list logo
