[Pan-users] Re: updated info

2010-08-03 Thread Zing
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 09:31:32 +, Duncan wrote: > So now's the time to step up if anyone's interested or has any ideas of > someone who might be. I think most of us would be fine with KHaley, and +1! > it's obvious from the comment that Charles is, but given that it's a > volunteer position a

[Pan-users] Re: updated info

2010-08-03 Thread Zing
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:54:05 -0600, K. Haley wrote: > Rebuilt testing has: > filtering on all headers for cached articles > some fixes? to text handling in article pane > bug424083: git based info in UA header & about dialog > bug403797: allowing subject line use in save dialog > > Any comments?

Re: [Pan-users] Re: updated info

2010-08-03 Thread walt
On 08/03/2010 02:31 AM, Duncan wrote: K Haley's the most obvious candidate given his community repo... Heh, interesting how perceptions differ in cyberspace. Ordinarily I wouldn't even mention this, but I've had a few glasses of wine and my good judgement is obviously impaired. AFAICR, K. ha

[Pan-users] Re: updated info

2010-08-03 Thread Petr Kovar
Hi! Duncan, Tue, 3 Aug 2010 09:31:32 + (UTC): > FWIW, it's official now (no longer speculation): Charles is now > definitely looking for someone to take over pan maintainership. He's no > longer interested, as he says he rarely if ever runs a news client any > more. > > K Haley's the most o

[Pan-users] Re: updated info

2010-08-03 Thread Duncan
walt posted on Mon, 02 Aug 2010 17:34:48 -0700 as excerpted: > On 08/02/2010 02:54 PM, K. Haley wrote: >> I've just moved some things from testing to master and rebuilt the >> testing branch. > > >> Any comments? > > Yes indeed. Thank you! for contributing your skills to the pan project > while

[Pan-users] Re: Reproducible crash retrieving headers in million-header group

2010-08-03 Thread Duncan
walt posted on Mon, 02 Aug 2010 17:22:30 -0700 as excerpted: > On 08/01/2010 06:38 PM, Duncan wrote: >> ...assuming the user's still on 32-bit, which is getting more and more >> legacy, these days... > > As a fellow gentoo-geek, I've noticed a very distinct change in the way > packages are update