Re: [Pan-users] Re: So, what's left before 1.0?

2009-10-01 Thread darren
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:17:00 + (UTC), Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > darren posted on Thu, 01 Oct 2009 05:16:08 -0700 as excerpted: > >> The nzb security hole that has been carried as a patch by numerous >> distro's (Might be in the Gnome repo already?) > > If you're talking about the

[Pan-users] Re: So, what's left before 1.0?

2009-10-01 Thread Duncan
darren posted on Thu, 01 Oct 2009 05:16:08 -0700 as excerpted: > The nzb security hole that has been carried as a patch by numerous > distro's (Might be in the Gnome repo already?) If you're talking about the one from May-ish of last year, yes, it's in the gnome repo, and in fact, 0.133 included

[Pan-users] Re: Here's something weird....

2009-10-01 Thread Jim Henderson
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 04:59:03 +, Duncan wrote: > Duncan posted on Thu, 01 Oct 2009 04:48:52 + as excerpted: > >> What about accel remapping? Have you tried that? > > So I explained the how, but didn't finish the why. I'm not sure whether > this will work or not, with alternative keyboar

Re: Re: [Pan-users] Re: So, what's left before 1.0?

2009-10-01 Thread Heinrich Mueller
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 01:28:19 + (UTC) Jim Henderson uttered these words: > > At the risk of introducing something completely outside the spirit > > of this update... > > > > ... does 'posting attachments' refer to the ability to post > > binaries? > > > > If it does, then it would be won

Re: [Pan-users] So, what's left before 1.0?

2009-10-01 Thread darren
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:47:16 -0500, Charles Kerr wrote: > A few posts back I mentioned that I don't remember what the > remaining checklist items were before this 43-release-long > beta series finally goes stable. > > I doubt anyone -- except maybe Duncan -- remembers, and > whatever they were,